James O’Keefe says that Dakota Leazer, a Google Growth Strategist, told a reporter working for O’Keefe Media Group that there is now “a coordinated plan by Big Tech to help Harris win the 2024 election.” Leazer also said that it is “most profitable” for the company when Americans are “fearful” of “some incoming doom” and that “democracy is going to end.”

As Leazer put it, “Google is a very open and forward-thinking business. I don’t think it’s political at the very top if they think that one side will help them make more money. I think it’s more like economics. I think it is all about, like, the shares and the stock price.”

Leazer also said that political headlines that are “fueled out of hate” help Google make money from ads. He said that the tech giant has pushed ads with “rhetoric that was very much for Kamala” that “seemed to link out to real news” sites.

“Hate is behind these political headlines that get people to click on them, which brings in ad income,” he said.

“Basically, Google was pushing words that were very pro-Kamala through its ads, and they seemed to link to real news sites,” Leazer said. “The ad looked like it was for PBS, but it was really for the Kamala campaign or something.”

“Big Tech and big companies are working together to try and get her to win,” the Google official said.

“If you take a step back and look at who really runs this country, it’s a small group of billionaires, and a lot of them are in tech. It’s almost like tech rules the media,” Leazer said.

“Not totally,” he said. “If you go to Google, they’re changing the way the search engine works so that Kamala is more popular.”

“I think Facebook is pushing photos and videos that are positive about her,” Leazer said. “A lot of the AI stuff that’s kind of freeing her up right now does so in a way that’s usually good for her.”

BREAKING: Google Growth Strategist Exposes Google’s Search Engine Manipulation for Kamala Harris Campaign, Revenue-Driven Political Bias

"Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very pro-Kamala,” admits Dakota Leazer (@dakotaleazer), a Growth… pic.twitter.com/nz37itKjBL

— O’Keefe Media Group (@OKeefeMedia) September 9, 2024

Leazer then said again that he thinks a small group of billionaires are trying to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential race.

“It seems like the top billionaires are working together to get Kamala to become our next CEO,” he said. “But I don’t think she will win.”

A lot of millionaires are planning to leave the UK this year because the left-wing Labour Party government of Sir Keir Starmer is likely to tax them too much.

While Rishi Sunak’s Tory government raised taxes to their highest level since World War II, a big part of this was to pay off debts incurred during the coronavirus lockdowns. Many people think that the British government will try to get even more money in the fall budget of the Labour government, with capital gains and inheritance taxes being two likely targets.

According to a story in The Times of London, a company that helps wealthy people move abroad said that they got 69% more calls from wealthy people wanting to leave the UK in August, the month after Prime Minister Starmer took office.

Henley & Partners, a similar business, said that a record 9,500 millionaires are expected to leave Britain this year. That’s more than any other country except Communist China.

It found that 4,200 millionaires left the country in the first five months of the year, which is when most people thought Labour would win the election. Another 5,300 millionaires are likely to leave by the end of the year. Low-tax places like Dubai, Singapore, and Switzerland are popular stopping spots for businesspeople and rich people.

People who are creative and spend lots of money are likely to leave, which has made people worry that the upcoming tax increases might not work with the Laffer Curve and not bring in enough money for the government.

Sir Keir Starmer has said that the people “with the broadest shoulders” should take the most weight. However, if a lot of rich Britons leave the country, Labour, which is meant to be the party of the working class, might have to raise taxes on middle-income people even more to pay for it.

Reports say that the government is already thinking about putting so-called “sin taxes” on sweets, cakes, and chips, as well as a tax on glass bottles. These changes would have the biggest effect on the poorest people, since they spend more of their money on food. Not only would this hurt the people already hurt by Labour’s plans to cut winter fuel support for seniors, but it would make things even worse.

Naval Ravikant, a famous Silicon Valley investor, said to Megyn Kelly that the legal action against former President Donald Trump made him “come off the sidelines.” He also said, “The moment you can weaponize the law on your enemies, that means the beginning of the end and a slide into a total banana republic.”

“The police weaponization is what kind of pulled me off the bleachers.” As Ravikant told Kelly on a recent show of The Megyn Kelly Show, “This is really disgusting actions because this is how you turn into a banana republic with military rule.” Ravikant helped to create AngelList and was its CEO for a while. He has invested in over 200 Silicon Valley startups over the course of a very successful career spanning decades.

“The end of the world starts the moment you can start using the law against your enemies on your own terms,” Ravikant said.

The businessman then used a famous quote by Óscar R. Benavides, who was President of Peru at the time: “For my friends, everything; for my foes, the law.”

Ravikant said, “That is, once you’re in charge and can say who the law applies to, you’re on a very slippery slope.” He added, “Slippery slopes are real.”

“If you look at the charges against Trump—and I did read them very carefully—they were false. They weren’t real,” Ravikant said.

“You broke the statute of limitations, you tried to make it sound like a crime when there was no proof. You can always find something when your business is complicated, like mine and a lot of other people’s,” he said.

Ravikant said more:

“This kind of selective punishment and harassment is what lets them get away with it. A lot of the progressive DA movement, which is led by George Soros and others, is based on the idea that, “Hey, we can choose whether or not to go after certain people.”

There’s new evidence that backs up what most people already knew: your phone does listen to you.

404 Media reports that a marketing company that works with Facebook and Google has quietly admitted that it listens to people on their phones using microphones and then shows ads based on what it hears.

The television and radio news company Cox Media Group (CMG) also told investors in a pitch deck that its “Active Listening” software makes use of AI to “capture real-time meaning data by listening to our talks,” according to the story.

“Advertisers can use this speaking data along with behavioral data to target people who are already in the market,” the company said in its pitch deck.

Consumers “leave a data trail based on their chats and online behavior,” according to the deck from CMG. The AI-powered software looks at this “behavioral and voice data from 470+ sources.”

According to the presentation, Amazon, Facebook, and Google are clients of CMG’s “Active Listening” service.

Also, Google took CMG off of its “Partners Program” page after 404 Media asked the company to speak on the situation.

A Google spokesperson told the New York Post, “All advertisers must follow all relevant rules and regulations as well as our Google Ads policies. When we find ads or advertisers that break these policies, we will take the necessary action.”

Meta, which is the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, said it would look into CMG to see if it broke any of its rules.

They said, “Meta does not use your cell’s microphone for ads, and we’ve been clear about this for years.”

“We are contacting CMG to make it clear that their scheme is not built on Meta data.”
But an Amazon representative told 404 Media that the company’s ads “have never worked with CMG on this program and have no plans to do so.”

Besides that, the business said it would punish any partner who broke its rules.

404 Media reports that this comes after MindSift, a company based in New Hampshire, said it used voice data to place focused ads by listening to people’s daily talks through microphones on their devices.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

On Friday, a person who used to work for the Clinton government wrote that Elon Musk is “out of control” and needs to be stopped.

“Elon Musk is out of control” was the title of Robert Reich’s opinion piece in the Guardian. “Here’s how to keep him in line.”

Reich, who used to be the Labor Secretary, said:

“Elon Musk is quickly turning his huge wealth—he is the richest person in the world—into a huge source of unchecked political power that supports Trump and other dictators around the world. He might have all the money in the world. He might own one of the most important social media sites in the world. That doesn’t mean we can’t stop him, though.”

Besides that, he said Musk let X users spread what he called “misinformation” on the site. Reich then gave Musk a list of ways to be “reined in,” one of which was to stop buying Tesla products.

“Regulators all over the world should use arrest threats against Musk if he doesn’t stop spreading lies and hate against X,” he said.

Reich’s last point was to “make sure Musk’s best choice for president does not win.”

It was in June 2023 that Reich wrote on social media that former President Trump shouldn’t be able to run for president again.

You should go after Trump, and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment makes it clear that someone who has “acted in rebellion” against the United States of America cannot hold public office. Taking him out of the running for president should be the only option. He said, “It’s that easy.”

Breitbart News said that the former Clinton official’s piece in the Guardian came after Telegram founder Pavel Durov was arrested in France:

“A story from Le Monde says that Durov was taken on a warrant for “various violations of his private messaging service.” There will likely be a court date on Sunday for the 39-year-old, who became a French citizen in 2021. The French government says Durov is responsible for Telegram’s “lack of control.” People in Europe are saying bad things about the chat app because it spreads false information “virally.”

While Durov was in jail, Musk told Breitbart News that he would “probably be smart” to “limit” his trips to places where free speech is not “constitutionally guaranteed.”