For decades now, Warren Buffett has been an icon not only in finance circles but also as a symbol of American capitalism and investment savvy. As Berkshire Hathaway investors now brace themselves for the historic handover of leadership from Buffett, we find ourselves at an important juncture. The Oracle of Omaha, who has long defined steady, conservative investing, is stepping back, and a new generation must carry forward his legacy.

Buffett’s departure marks more than just a simple transition in corporate leadership. It’s the end of an era that shaped the investment landscape for millions of Americans. His wisdom, encapsulated in simple yet powerful advice—”Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful”—has become a cornerstone of conservative financial thought. As he prepares to pass the baton, investors are understandably cautious about what comes next.

The Berkshire faithful have grown accustomed to Buffett’s clear-eyed, patient approach. Under his stewardship, Berkshire Hathaway has grown from a struggling textile company into one of the most influential conglomerates in history, with significant holdings in sectors ranging from insurance and railroads to energy and consumer goods. Buffett’s uncompromising belief in American businesses and innovation mirrored the patriotic resolve of President Trump’s “America First” approach, emphasizing domestic strength and prosperity above globalist interests.

Yet, as Buffett steps aside, we must ask ourselves whether Berkshire Hathaway can maintain its distinct identity without the man who built it. Investors know that leadership transitions can often bring uncertainty, especially when the departing figure has been as influential and steadfast as Buffett. Will his successors preserve the conservative investment philosophy that made Berkshire Hathaway an American powerhouse, or will they succumb to the kinds of trendy, short-term thinking that Buffett himself so famously shunned?

Buffett’s longtime lieutenant, Greg Abel, is set to take the reins, a move long anticipated by those who closely watch Berkshire. Abel, who oversaw the company’s energy holdings, is seen as a steady hand, a man well-suited to maintain the tradition of prudent management. However, he faces a challenge familiar to anyone stepping into shoes as large as Buffett’s: asserting his own leadership style without losing the trust and loyalty of those who admired his predecessor.

Moreover, Abel’s leadership comes at a critical moment for American industry. Under President Trump’s renewed commitment to reshoring manufacturing, revitalizing domestic energy production, and ending foreign entanglements, American investors have seen a resurgence of optimism and national pride. Berkshire, with its vast industrial holdings and investments rooted deeply in American soil, is perfectly positioned to capitalize on this renewed America First economic agenda. Yet, it will require Abel and his team to fully embrace this patriotic economic vision, just as Buffett himself once championed the strength and resilience of American enterprise.

The core conservative values that built Berkshire Hathaway—long-term thinking, disciplined investing, and unwavering belief in America’s potential—must remain at the heart of the company’s strategy. Investors who have trusted Berkshire precisely because of Buffett’s consistent, principled leadership will be watching closely. Abel and his executives must demonstrate that they understand what made Buffett’s approach special and commit themselves fully to preserving those principles.

As Buffett himself once said, “Someone’s sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.” It is now Abel’s responsibility—and indeed, the responsibility of every leader who inherits a legacy—to continue planting those trees, ensuring that future generations of investors benefit from the same wise stewardship.

Ultimately, the transition at Berkshire Hathaway is about more than just corporate succession. It’s about preserving a distinctly American way of doing business: patient, principled, and patriotic. It’s about carrying forward the wisdom of a man who embodied the best of capitalism and American ingenuity. For the sake of investors, workers, and citizens alike, let’s hope Berkshire Hathaway remains true to the vision Warren Buffett championed for so many years.

President Donald Trump isn’t playing around. In a bold, decisive move reflecting his America First agenda, Trump’s newly unveiled 2026 budget proposal takes direct aim at federal programs that have long incentivized illegal immigration. This isn’t just another budget exercise—it’s a clear statement to the American people that the era of taxpayer-funded incentives for illegal migration is over.

The Trump administration has outlined a comprehensive plan to slash funding for numerous costly programs that have effectively served as magnets for illegal border crossings. According to an exclusive memo obtained by Blaze News, these programs don’t just waste taxpayer money—they actively undermine American sovereignty and the rule of law. Trump’s proposed budget would eliminate a total of $5.6 billion in funding currently directed toward migrant programs.

One of the major targets in Trump’s budget is the English Language Acquisition program, a pet project of the Biden years that poured nearly $890 million into so-called “educational equity” initiatives. These initiatives often prioritized multilingualism and progressive ideological indoctrination over teaching English—the language of American opportunity. Trump’s team makes clear this is unacceptable, calling the program out for “simultaneously promoting divisive ideological indoctrination in the classroom.”

It’s not just English programs on the chopping block. Trump’s budget targets multiple federal grant programs, including the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act and the Migrant Education and Special Programs for Migrant Students, which would save taxpayers $729 million and $428 million respectively. These expensive programs have often been hijacked by progressive activists to push radical diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) theories on vulnerable migrant populations rather than equipping them with practical education and skills that benefit America.

Perhaps most significantly, President Trump is taking a sledgehammer to the Department of Homeland Security’s Shelter and Services Program—an Obama-Biden era relic that the Trump administration rightly points out has “massively facilitated illegal migration.” Under Biden, this $650 million program provided transportation and shelter to illegal migrants, encouraging even more illegal crossings by guaranteeing taxpayer-funded amenities. Eliminating this program sends a powerful message to would-be border crossers: the dangerous journey north will no longer be rewarded by American taxpayers.

Another bold cut targets the State Department’s Migration and Refugee Assistance, a slush fund that ballooned to a whopping $3.5 billion under Biden’s watch, used primarily to facilitate illegal migration under the guise of questionable refugee claims. Trump’s budget doesn’t just trim this program; it eliminates it entirely, returning accountability and responsibility to immigration policy.

This isn’t about penny-pinching or budget hawkishness alone. At its core, Trump’s budget reflects a deeper conservative principle: prioritizing American citizens over those who break our laws. This administration rightly recognizes that taxpayer money should never be used to incentivize illegal behavior. As the memo states unequivocally, “President Trump is committed to eliminating the funding of our own invasion.”

The impact of Trump’s policies is already clear. Border crossings have plunged dramatically, proving that strong enforcement and clear messaging work. Now, by defunding programs that encourage illegal immigration, Trump is taking the next bold step toward restoring law and order.

Critics on the left will undoubtedly cry foul, labeling these cuts as “cruel” or “inhumane.” But what’s truly inhumane is encouraging migrants to risk their lives on dangerous journeys, lured by taxpayer-funded promises. What’s cruel is draining resources from American families and communities to subsidize illegal behavior.

With this budget proposal, Trump has once again demonstrated his unwavering commitment to putting America First. In stark contrast to the Biden administration’s reckless spending and open-border fantasies, Trump’s budget is a beacon of common sense and responsible governance—exactly what Americans voted for.

The Biden-era hangover continues to cast a long shadow. This month alone, nearly 130 major American companies are preparing to lay off employees, cutting jobs from coast to coast. If you’re someone who cares about American workers, about families trying to put food on the table, this isn’t just another headline—it’s a gut punch.

We hear a lot about economic recovery, about how we’re “building back,” but let’s talk plainly: America is still paying for the reckless policies of Joe Biden and his allies. The economic damage they inflicted through unchecked spending, crushing regulations, and weak trade policies didn’t disappear when President Trump returned to office. It lingers, like an anchor dragging behind America’s ship of state, and it’s workers who feel the brunt.

According to data compiled by WARNTracker.com, the layoffs for May include household names from across multiple sectors. Companies like FedEx, AT&T, Amazon, Wells Fargo, Starbucks, and Macy’s are among those trimming their workforce. These are not minor adjustments; these are American jobs—real lives, real families. We’re talking about thousands of people impacted, from the retail sector to tech, financial services, and manufacturing.

Bryan Driscoll, a prominent HR expert, put it bluntly to Newsweek: “Workers should brace themselves, yes, not because they’re underperforming, but because employers are still addicted to short-term balance sheet optics.”

This is exactly why President Trump continues to push aggressively for America First economic policies. We need manufacturing here at home, not outsourced overseas. We must have trade deals that benefit American companies and American workers first. We need to put an end to the globalist ideology that prioritizes corporate profits and cheap overseas labor over the hardworking Americans who built this nation.

The layoffs aren’t limited to the private sector, either. Even government entities such as the Department of Health and Human Services are downsizing, in part due to restructuring from the Biden administration’s lingering impacts. As financial literacy instructor Alex Beene explained to Newsweek, these layoffs show two troubling trends: private companies looking to maximize profits at the expense of American workers, and public institutions grappling with the bureaucratic labyrinth Biden left behind.

Americans didn’t elect President Trump simply for slogans or marketing. They elected him to clean up the mess, to reverse the damage, and to put America firmly back on track. And that’s exactly what he’s working to do. Through aggressive trade negotiations, reformed regulations, and policies that incentivize companies to manufacture in America and hire American workers, the Trump administration is laying the foundation for real recovery.

But let’s be clear: the damage done by Biden and his allies didn’t happen overnight, and it won’t be fixed overnight either. These layoffs are painful reminders of what happens when we abandon an America First mindset. Workers pay the price, while corporate executives and shareholders continue to cash their bonuses.

In the months ahead, conservatives must remain steadfast. We need representatives in Congress who back President Trump’s vision for economic revival—representatives who understand that American workers are our backbone, not expendable line items on a corporate budget.

This isn’t merely an economic issue; it’s a moral issue. It’s about preserving the dignity and prosperity of American families. It’s about ensuring that our country doesn’t just recover, but thrives.

So, as we see these layoffs unfold, let’s recommit ourselves to the principles that made America great in the first place: secure borders, strong manufacturing, fair trade deals, an education system that prepares students for real jobs, and an end to overseas entanglements that drain our resources. President Trump remains focused on these priorities—and it’s up to us, everyday patriotic Americans, to stand strong and support him in this critical fight.

Jimmy “MrBeast” Donaldson, the internet sensation famous for his ultra-lavish YouTube giveaways and massive social media following, has dropped an intriguing hint that he might soon own Elon Musk’s social media platform, X—the platform formerly known as Twitter. While this might seem like just another playful exchange between two high-profile figures, it raises questions about the future of free speech and the power of influential personalities in our increasingly digital society.

It all started when MrBeast shared a screenshot from a conversation he had with Musk dating back to 2022. In this exchange, Musk jokingly agreed to hand Twitter over to Donaldson if something were to happen to him. “If I die under mysterious circumstances, it’s been nice knowing ya,” Musk wrote, to which MrBeast replied, “If that happens can I have Twitter?” Musk’s lighthearted reply was simply, “Ok.”

Now, fast forward to today—MrBeast resurfaced that old conversation after Musk responded to his latest viral post. Donaldson had tweeted a provocative challenge titled “100 Men vs a Gorilla,” which quickly garnered millions of views and hundreds of thousands of likes. Musk, never one to shy away from a bit of controversy, responded, “Sure, what’s the worst that could happen?” Seizing the moment, Donaldson reposted their old conversation, stating bluntly, “I might actually own this platform soon.”

Is this just playful banter, or could it signal something more significant on the horizon? It’s worth remembering that MrBeast isn’t merely a YouTube entertainer—he’s a savvy entrepreneur, rapidly approaching billionaire status, according to Forbes. His multiple business ventures, including MrBeast Burger and Feastables, clearly indicate he’s not afraid to take bold leaps into new markets.

And let’s be honest—today’s social media landscape is ripe for disruption. Ever since Musk bravely took over Twitter and rebranded it as X, conservatives have applauded his efforts to restore free speech to a platform previously marred by relentless liberal censorship. Musk has been a breath of fresh air, turning a stagnant, biased social media giant into a battlefield where ideas can once again be openly debated. But what would MrBeast’s involvement mean for the future of X?

On one hand, Donaldson has no clear history of political bias. He’s known best for viral stunts, giveaways, and harmless entertainment—hardly a culture warrior. But precisely because he’s apolitical, conservatives should remain cautious. While neutrality can be refreshing, it can also mean vulnerability to influence from the loudest voices of the woke mob.

Moreover, MrBeast’s past flirtations with buying other platforms—such as his earlier offer to purchase TikTok amid threats of a U.S. ban—demonstrate an appetite for wielding social media power. As conservatives who’ve witnessed years of big tech censorship, we must remain vigilant about the potential implications of yet another powerful individual controlling a leading platform.

More broadly, this exchange between Musk and MrBeast highlights the outsized role that a handful of tech elites now play in shaping public discourse. As President Trump continues to fight for America First policies—reviving manufacturing, securing our borders, and ending foreign entanglements—we must also recognize the critical importance of protecting our digital commons from arbitrary control.

In these uncertain times, conservatives must advocate for transparency, accountability, and fairness online. Whether MrBeast is joking or genuinely interested in taking the reins of X, the episode serves as a stark reminder that the digital public square remains precariously in the hands of a select few. It’s our duty as patriots to ensure that the principles of free speech, open debate, and American values remain front and center—no matter who ultimately sits in the CEO’s chair.

America is roaring back, and the latest proof comes straight from Corning, the iconic American materials giant, which just announced a massive boost in their domestic manufacturing investment. Originally slated at $900 million, Corning’s new solar component facility in Saginaw County, Michigan, will now see a total investment of $1.5 billion. This isn’t just good news—it’s proof positive that President Trump’s America First policies are reshaping our industrial landscape, bringing jobs and prosperity back to the heartland.

Corning’s CEO, Wendell P. Weeks, proudly stated that the increased investment is directly driven by “increasing demand for U.S.-made solar components.” What does this mean for real Americans? It means 400 more high-paying manufacturing jobs, on top of the initial 1,100 positions, right here in Michigan. These are not just jobs—they’re careers, offering wages significantly above the regional median, thanks to a robust partnership with the Michigan Strategic Fund and their approval of over $109 million in grants and incentives.

Make no mistake, Corning’s decision is not happening in isolation. It’s a direct result of the Trump administration’s aggressive approach to trade policy, specifically the recent implementation of universal baseline tariffs and substantial reciprocal tariffs on countries engaged in unfair trade practices. America is finally standing up to foreign economic aggression, and companies are responding by bringing their manufacturing back home where it belongs.

First Solar’s CEO Mark Widmar recently emphasized the challenges posed by Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which have significantly impacted foreign-produced solar products, particularly from China-backed operations in Malaysia, Vietnam, and India. “The president’s implementation of reciprocal tariffs earlier this month creates a significant economic headwind for our manufacturing facilities in these countries selling into the U.S. market,” Widmar acknowledged. This underscores exactly why President Trump’s tariffs are working as intended: making foreign-made components less attractive and pushing manufacturers to invest in American workers and American plants.

Further highlighting the success of these policies, the Department of Commerce recently announced monumental tariffs—up to an eye-popping 3,521 percent—on solar cell imports from four Southeast Asian nations, following revelations of massive Chinese subsidies and unfair trade practices. The American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee rightly hailed the move as a “decisive victory for American manufacturing.” Tim Brightbill, lead counsel for the coalition, stated bluntly, “Chinese-headquartered solar companies have been cheating the system, undercutting U.S. companies, and costing American workers their livelihoods.”

Indeed, enforcing our trade laws has become a cornerstone in President Trump’s America First agenda. These measures aren’t merely punitive—they’re strategic acts of economic patriotism essential for rebuilding our industrial base, securing our energy independence, and protecting American jobs. Corning’s expanded investment in Michigan is exactly the type of response the administration anticipated and planned for when implementing these tariffs.

The strategic vision of the Trump administration is clear, and we’re witnessing its success unfold in real-time. According to recent data from the Energy Information Administration, America added a record 30 gigawatts of utility-scale solar generation capacity in 2024 alone, with another 32.5 gigawatts projected this year. States like Texas, California, Michigan, and Arizona are leading the charge, proving once again that when American workers are given a level playing field, they can outcompete anyone in the world.

President Trump’s bold stance against unfair trade isn’t about isolationism; it’s about fairness, sovereignty, and economic strength. It’s about believing in America again. Corning’s $1.5 billion commitment is a testament to the effectiveness of Trump’s economic strategy. Companies are moving away from dependency on China and other nations, choosing instead to invest heavily in American manufacturing and American workers.

As conservatives, we must continue supporting these America First policies that put our nation’s economic health, security, and workers first. Corning’s move sends a message loud and clear: America is open for business, and the American worker is ready to lead the way toward a revitalized industrial future.

America’s religious liberty is once again under scrutiny, as the Supreme Court takes up a landmark case that could redefine the boundaries of faith and education in America. At the center of this legal battle is a decision about whether public funding can rightfully support a religious charter school in Oklahoma, a matter that goes to the very heart of our constitutional protections and religious freedoms.

The case revolves around St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, an institution approved by Oklahoma’s Statewide Virtual Charter School Board to operate as a publicly funded religious charter school. Predictably, leftist activist groups have pounced, arguing that taxpayer dollars should never flow to institutions grounded in faith, citing an outdated and restrictive interpretation of the Establishment Clause. But conservatives see this as an essential opportunity to reaffirm the historic American tradition of religious freedom, reminding the nation that the Constitution guarantees the free exercise of religion—not its discrimination.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, reliably thoughtful and constitutionally grounded, highlighted the core issue during oral arguments. “The real question here is whether we’re going to treat religious people equally or we’re going to discriminate against them,” Gorsuch remarked, pointing directly at the heart of the debate. This isn’t simply about a single school in Oklahoma—it’s about whether religious Americans will be treated on equal footing with everyone else when it comes to state support.

The left argues vehemently that funding a religious charter school breaches the so-called “wall of separation” between church and state. But conservatives know better: this so-called wall was never intended to exclude religion entirely from public life. Thomas Jefferson himself, in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptists, sought to protect religious institutions from government interference—not to drive religion from the public sphere altogether. Our Founders believed deeply in religious liberty, not religious hostility, and the Supreme Court now has the chance to affirm that timeless truth.

In recent years, the conservative-majority Supreme Court has consistently upheld the rights of religious institutions in landmark cases such as Carson v. Makin and Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. These rulings have reinforced that religious schools cannot be excluded from public programs simply because of their religious identity. The opposition’s argument that a charter school becomes inherently unconstitutional simply because it holds to religious values has already been convincingly rejected by the Court. It’s time to solidify that principle once and for all.

Moreover, allowing families to choose a religious charter school is entirely in keeping with conservative principles of parental choice and educational freedom. For too long, left-wing bureaucrats have dictated how and where our children must learn, forcing families into failing schools that undermine the values they hold dear. Expanding educational opportunities to include religious charter schools empowers parents—not government—to make the best educational decisions for their children. As Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond put it, “Parents, not bureaucrats, should be the ones deciding what education best fits their child’s needs.”

Critics claim this will open the floodgates to government-funded religious indoctrination. But let’s be clear: parents who choose St. Isidore or any other religious charter school do so voluntarily. No family is forced into this choice. It’s a matter of personal freedom, personal conviction, and respect for individual conscience—core conservative values that must be vigorously defended.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision on this case will have ramifications far beyond Oklahoma. It will send a powerful message about whether America truly respects religious liberty or succumbs to left-wing pressure to marginalize faith from public life. Conservatives nationwide await the ruling with anticipation, hoping the Court reaffirms once again that religious freedom isn’t a privilege—it’s a fundamental American right.

The Supreme Court is gearing up for a landmark showdown—a case with consequences that could ripple through our economy and impact President Trump’s efforts to put America First. At stake is the president’s authority over the Federal Reserve, specifically his ability to dismiss the Fed Chair, a position currently held by Jerome Powell. This isn’t just a theoretical legal debate; it’s about accountability, oversight, and restoring common-sense leadership to an institution that holds tremendous sway over ordinary Americans’ livelihoods.

The case before the Supreme Court, known as Community Financial Services Association v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), might seem unrelated at first glance. But the core issue—whether the president has the constitutional power to fire officials heading independent agencies—cuts to the heart of governmental accountability. If the Court rules decisively in favor of executive authority, it could pave the way for Trump to exert stronger oversight over the Federal Reserve chairmanship, a position historically insulated from direct presidential control.

Conservatives have long criticized the Fed’s unchecked power. The central bank wields enormous influence over interest rates, inflation, and employment—affecting every American household’s wallet and savings. Yet, its decisions are frequently made behind closed doors, with little transparency or direct accountability to voters. President Trump has consistently stressed the importance of oversight, arguing that no unelected bureaucrat should steer the economy without clear accountability to the American people.

Trump’s stance on Powell is no secret. He appointed Powell in 2018 but quickly grew frustrated as the Fed chair repeatedly hiked interest rates, undermining Trump’s pro-growth, manufacturing-revival agenda. Trump has openly lamented Powell’s decisions, asserting that “the Federal Reserve doesn’t have a clue” and emphasizing the need for leadership aligned with America’s economic interests. A favorable Supreme Court ruling could finally give Trump the leverage to replace Powell with someone committed to America’s prosperity and economic independence.

Democrats and establishment Republicans alike will cry foul, claiming that greater presidential oversight threatens the Fed’s “independence.” But let’s be clear: independence should never mean immunity from accountability. The Fed’s job isn’t to operate above politics—it’s to serve the American people. When the Fed stifles growth or encourages inflationary policies, it directly hurts working-class families, undermines American manufacturing, and weakens our global economic standing.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh previously wrote in a similar case, “Under our Constitution, the executive power—all of it—is vested exclusively in the President.” This principle is crucial. Unelected bureaucrats must answer to the chief executive, who in turn answers directly to voters. This is fundamental to our constitutional republic and essential for preserving liberty. The Supreme Court now has an opportunity to reaffirm this principle and restore proper executive oversight over powerful federal institutions.

Make no mistake: this battle is about more than personalities or current policy disagreements. It’s about safeguarding our democratic system from unelected elites who believe they’re immune from accountability. It’s about ensuring that our economic policy aligns with the priorities of the American people—priorities like job creation, affordable living costs, and fair trade practices. And it’s about President Trump’s continued commitment to reshaping Washington’s entrenched bureaucracy, putting Main Street before Wall Street.

Now is the time to rally behind this critical constitutional principle. The Supreme Court must side with executive accountability, providing Trump the authority necessary to steer America’s economic future toward growth, prosperity, and true American independence. Trump’s America First agenda demands clear accountability from every federal agency and every unelected bureaucrat who wields power over American lives. The days of insulated bureaucratic elites are numbered—it’s time to restore power and accountability directly to the American people, where it belongs.

Google has finally been dealt the blow it long deserved. Last week, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled in Virginia that Google’s digital ad network constitutes an illegal monopoly—a ruling that is already sending shockwaves through Big Tech and putting Silicon Valley on notice. For years, Google has thrived by gobbling up smaller competitors and consolidating control over digital advertising, manipulating markets to fuel its $1.8 trillion empire. Now, justice has caught up.

This ruling marks the second time in less than a year that federal courts have branded Google as an abusive monopolist. Last August, another federal judge found Google’s ubiquitous search engine guilty of illegally leveraging its dominance to crush competition and suppress innovation. Taken together, these rulings draw a clear picture: Google’s dominance hasn’t been earned through fair competition but through predatory practices designed to strangle rivals and limit consumer choice.

The Justice Department first set its sights on Google’s search engine monopoly during President Trump’s first term—a long-overdue action that was finally pursued. When Biden’s administration later targeted Google’s lucrative ad network, many conservatives worried this might amount to mere political grandstanding. But the evidence presented in court was undeniable. Google’s anti-competitive practices have had a devastating effect on online publishers, especially news outlets struggling to survive in today’s digital landscape.

“For over a decade, Google has tied its publisher ad server and ad exchange together through contractual policies and technological integration, which enabled the company to establish and protect its monopoly power,” Judge Brinkema wrote in her scathing 115-page decision. “Google further entrenched its monopoly power by imposing anticompetitive policies on its customers and eliminating desirable product features.”

This ruling is far more than a slap on the wrist—it’s a direct call to action against a digital behemoth whose unchecked power threatens the very foundation of free-market capitalism. Brinkema’s decision specifically highlights the harm done to publishers, including prominent conservative media outlets, who have been forced to depend on Google’s manipulated ad exchange for revenue. The judge rejected Google’s defense that publishers “have many options,” noting instead that Google’s dominance left publishers little choice but to accept the tech giant’s oppressive terms.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi didn’t mince words, calling the decision a “landmark victory in the ongoing fight to stop Google from monopolizing the digital public square.” She’s right. Google has built its empire on the backs of hardworking Americans and small businesses that rely on fair competition to survive. Its monopoly power doesn’t just hurt economic freedom—it threatens free speech itself, as publishers dependent on Google’s ad revenue often fear retribution if they dare criticize the tech giant.

Google, of course, immediately vowed to appeal. The company claimed in a statement that it disagreed with the court’s findings, arguing its tools provide affordable and effective options for publishers. But conservative Americans who’ve witnessed firsthand Big Tech’s relentless censorship and bias aren’t buying Google’s excuses. For years, we’ve watched as Google demonetized conservative voices and rigged search results against viewpoints it disliked. This ruling confirms what many on the right have long known: Google’s dominance isn’t just economic—it’s ideological. And it must be dismantled.

The Justice Department now has the opportunity to follow through on its proposed remedy, potentially forcing Google to sell off parts of its advertising technology. This would be a welcome step toward restoring a free and fair digital marketplace. It would also send a clear message to other Big Tech giants, from Facebook to Amazon, that the era of unlimited Silicon Valley power is at an end.

Under President Trump’s leadership, America has returned to its foundational principles: strong borders, economic nationalism, and a government that works for the American people—not against them. Breaking Google’s illegal monopoly aligns perfectly with these America First priorities. It strengthens our economy by giving small businesses and publishers a fighting chance, restores fairness in our markets, and puts the interests of everyday Americans above the profits of Big Tech elites.

It’s time to finish what we’ve started and reclaim the digital public square for the American people. Google’s monopolistic reign must end—for the sake of our economy, our democracy, and our liberty.

It’s time to face the economic reality staring us dead in the eye and ask ourselves a vital question: what’s really happening with our money, and more importantly, what should we do about it? With gold’s meteoric rise of 90% in the past five years, you’d think we’d struck it rich. Yet, even this bright-shining old standard can barely maintain its value against the tidal wave of new dollars flooding the marketplace. In 2020 alone, over 40% of our USD supply was created, a staggering figure that should send chills down every fiscally responsible spine. Imagine, over a century of hard-earned value diluted with the digital swipe of a button. It’s no wonder folks are feeling the squeeze in their wallets.

But there’s another player on the field, one that’s both intriguing and polarizing: Bitcoin. Yes, amid the noise, speculation, and dare I say, hysteria surrounding cryptocurrencies, let’s cut the nonsense and look at the numbers. With a 1,000% gain since the COVID crash, Bitcoin has outperformed every major asset class. Let’s not mince words here: that’s not just a performance; it’s a seismic shift. Bitcoin, a decentralized currency not tethered to any government agenda or policy, challenges the established monetary order in ways we’ve never seen before. Now, I know what you’re thinking—Bitcoin’s volatility is notorious, enough to make even seasoned investors break into a cold sweat. But set that aside for a moment and consider its long-term resilience.

What does all of this tell us? First and foremost, the relentless printing of money by elite policymakers isn’t a victimless crime. Inflation is no longer just an economic concept confined to university textbooks; it’s an immediate threat. Every time they churn out more cash, it’s your savings that get devalued. The purchasing power you’ve painstakingly built doesn’t just erode; it hemorrhages. You’ve got to wonder if this is a deliberate act to create dependency or just sheer incompetence.

As conservatives, we are champions for limited government and fiscal responsibility. The reckless monetary policy we’re seeing is a clarion call for change. How do we, as individuals and as a nation, preserve our financial sovereignty? Gold has always been a fortress, and for good reason. It’s tangible, with centuries of trust anchored to its name. Holding physical gold is like owning a piece of financial history that bureaucrats can’t inflate away.

But the conversation doesn’t stop at tradition. Enter Bitcoin—a new-age asset that’s redefining what money can be. Its verifiable scarcity and decentralized nature make it an attractive option for those seeking refuge from government overreach. Bitcoin invites us to imagine a world where currency is not manipulated by the whims of political elites but is, instead, governed by immutable code. For many, this represents financial freedom in its purest form.

It’s crucial, however, that we approach Bitcoin with eyes wide open. It’s not the perfect solution, and its volatility presents legitimate risks. But allow me to put it this way: as conservatives, we respect innovation when it aligns with our principles of individual liberty and free markets. Bitcoin embodies these ideas. It might not replace gold, but it certainly complements it, offering perhaps the best of both worlds—a digital hedge against government malfeasance.

In essence, we stand at a crossroads of economic history. What does it mean to preserve wealth in a world of reckless monetary policy? Perhaps a diversified approach, striking a balance between the enduring legacy of gold and the cutting-edge promise of Bitcoin, aligns best with conservative values.

It’s time we take control, protect our assets, and set the stage for an economic future that aligns with our core principles—limited government, individual responsibility, and, above all, liberty in our financial affairs. The message is clear: our economic destiny isn’t written by those who print, but by those who prepare.

Step aside! The silent majority is roaring back to life, echoing across this great nation with the heartbeat of true American values. While progressives busily dismantle the foundational tenets that built America, conservatives are rallying to counteract the damage. We have watched the left’s insatiable appetite for control wreak havoc on our core liberties, and now, it’s time to reclaim the reins of governance and remind everyone of what makes America remarkable.

At the heart of this dynamic revival is the Make America Great Again movement—a powerful banner under which freedom-loving citizens unite. This isn’t just a slogan; it’s a call to action, a guiding philosophy that places American interests above all else. Yet, how have we arrived at this juncture, where our way of life is threatened daily by misguided policies and overreach? Let’s delve into the gnawing issues that conservatives are determined to address.

First, let’s talk about economic freedom—a cornerstone of the MAGA agenda. The left’s relentless push toward socialism under the guise of equity constitutes an existential threat to our capitalistic foundations. Take, for instance, the spectacle surrounding Green New Deal-type policies. Their resistant-to-reality regulations threaten to stifle innovation and kill jobs, all in the name of an ideology that seems to abhor human prosperity. Instead of fostering an environment where enterprise can flourish, where businesses can innovate and expand, these reckless plans endanger our economic vitality.

Next, consider the erosion of traditional values at the hands of progressive activists. The cultural upheaval we’re witnessing is guiding the generations toward a dangerous disconnect with history—a history that embodies principles of hard work, individual responsibility, and patriotism. Take education, for example. Schools are morphing into indoctrination camps, prioritizing social justice over factual learning, where CRT (Critical Race Theory) and other divisive doctrines poison young minds. We must reaffirm the importance of a balanced education system that celebrates our collective national achievements rather than fixating on perceived past transgressions.

Then, there’s the left’s unabated assault on our constitutional rights, notably the Second Amendment. While they argue for so-called “common sense” gun control, what they really seek is to infringe on the fundamental right to bear arms—a right that empowers individuals to defend themselves from threats, both foreign and domestic. The irony here is that the very champions of personal autonomy when it comes to certain freedoms seem more than willing to strip others away without hesitation.

But let’s talk facts, folks. Under the Trump administration, we saw an undeniable boom—a period of unparalleled economic growth, reduced unemployment, and increased national security. The America First doctrine catalyzed a new era of optimism, driving home the simple truth: when you put American interests first, America wins. It’s this common-sense approach that we’re clawing back onto the national stage—no apologies, no compromises. We put faith in our citizens, not in bureaucrats and certainly not in foreign powers who don’t have our best interests in mind.

The conservative awakening is more than a reaction; it’s a robust proactive blueprint to protect and advance what makes America exceptional. We need leaders who respect borders, champion economic freedoms, and invest in defending our foundational liberties. This isn’t hyperbole or grandstanding—this is the bare minimum for preserving the American way of life.

So, as we gaze toward the horizon, it’s our duty to act. Whether it’s turning out to vote or simply engaging in civil discourse, our voices carry the weight to make a difference. Let’s stand firm, rooted in our conviction and clarity of purpose. The road ahead may be fraught with challenges, but with bold action and unwavering belief in our nation’s promise, we can Make America Great Again—today, tomorrow, and for generations yet to come.

We are not just another voice in the wilderness; we are the beacon guiding America back to its rightful place of honor and strength. It is time to rise and reclaim our exceptionalism.