Author

dmgadmin

Browsing

Time’s running out for the Biden administration, and the panic is palpable. With $39 billion in CHIPS Act funding on the line, the White House is frantically trying to finalize deals before President-elect Donald Trump steps into office and introduces some much-needed common sense to this bloated boondoggle.

The CHIPS Act, signed into law in 2022, was supposed to revive American semiconductor manufacturing and reduce reliance on Taiwan. Sounds good, right? But in typical Biden fashion, it’s been a bureaucratic slog. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo promised to allocate every dollar before year’s end, yet only $6.6 billion—just 17% of the funds—has actually been finalized. Even Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, whose company stands to gain billions, has had enough. “We are disappointed by how long and how slow the dispensing of funds has been,” Gelsinger lamented, as reported by Bloomberg.

The clock is ticking, and Biden’s team knows it. They’ve scrambled to announce deals, including a $6.6 billion agreement with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), hoping to lock in at least $1 billion before Trump takes office. But here’s the problem: the CHIPS Act isn’t the slam dunk Democrats claim. Trump himself has criticized the act, calling it a convoluted mess that wastes taxpayer dollars. On a podcast with Joe Rogan, Trump argued that tariffs—not handouts—are the smarter way to bring chip manufacturing back to U.S. soil.

And Trump’s right. The CHIPS Act is another classic example of Democrats overcomplicating things with bureaucracy and red tape. While Biden’s administration fumbles to finalize deals, the companies involved are stuck in limbo, negotiating terms and benchmarks for access to funds. Meanwhile, the administration is racing to lock these deals down, knowing Trump might hit the brakes—or even rewrite the rules—once he takes office.

Here’s the kicker: these deals are legally binding. Once signed, they’re tough to undo unless companies fail to meet their obligations. So, Biden’s last-minute scramble isn’t just about optics—it’s about tying Trump’s hands and forcing the next administration to live with these half-baked agreements.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Semiconductors power everything from smartphones to cars, and America can’t afford to fall behind. But under Biden, this process has been a masterclass in how not to govern. Trump’s America First approach, prioritizing tariffs and streamlined policies, is exactly what the industry needs to thrive. While Biden flails, Trump will deliver results, cutting through the nonsense and ensuring American manufacturing regains its competitive edge.

President-elect Donald Trump has always been a straight shooter, and his stance on the Federal Reserve is no exception. During his campaign, Trump made it clear that the Fed’s so-called “independence” should not exempt it from accountability. He even argued that the president should have a say in the central bank’s interest-rate decisions—something that has sent establishment economists clutching their pearls.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, clearly not a fan of Trump’s no-nonsense approach, has already staked out his position, claiming he wouldn’t resign even if asked. Powell says Trump doesn’t have the legal authority to fire him. Of course, Democrats and establishment economists are now spinning this as an impending “crisis” between the Fed and the incoming administration, because they never miss a chance to paint Trump as the villain.

Enter Dario Perkins, an economist at TS Lombard, who gleefully predicts a “showdown” between Trump and Powell. Perkins suggests that Powell could weaponize the bond market—yes, weaponize it—to push back against Trump’s populist policies like tax cuts, tariffs, and deporting undocumented immigrants. Apparently, the idea of putting America First is just too radical for the globalist elites.

Perkins argues that Powell will stand firm against any influence from Trump, claiming that bending to Trump’s will would “destroy [Powell’s] legacy.” Instead, Perkins fantasizes about Powell going down in history as the “guy who tamed post-COVID inflation,” conveniently ignoring the fact that Powell’s policies helped create the inflation crisis in the first place.

Here’s the truth: Trump isn’t trying to bully the Fed—he’s trying to ensure that American families and businesses aren’t crushed by sky-high interest rates. Democrats and their media allies love to frame Trump’s policies as “chaotic,” but the real chaos is what we’ve seen under Biden: out-of-control inflation, reckless spending, and economic stagnation.

Trump’s approach is simple: hold the Fed accountable, keep interest rates reasonable, and prioritize the American worker. If Powell wants to play games with the bond market to protect his legacy, he’ll only prove Trump’s point that the Fed is more interested in protecting Wall Street than Main Street.

The left can’t stand the idea of Trump restoring fiscal sanity, so they spin doomsday scenarios like “Trump-inspired chaos at the Fed.” But here’s the reality: Trump’s first term delivered historic economic growth, low unemployment, and rising wages. The Fed wasn’t a roadblock then, and it won’t be this time either.

Democrats want you to believe that Powell and the bond vigilantes are the heroes standing between Trump and financial apocalypse. But the real story is much simpler: Trump is fighting for the American people, while the establishment clings to its power and its failing status quo.

Bitcoin, the digital currency that has been shaking up the financial world since 2009, is surging to record heights, nearing an astonishing $100,000 per coin. This meteoric rise—up 130% in 2024 alone—is being hailed as one of the key “Trump trades,” a market shift fueled by President-elect Donald Trump’s pro-crypto policies and investor confidence in his leadership.

Trump, who famously released crypto-based digital trading cards last year, has made his stance on cryptocurrency abundantly clear. During his presidential campaign, he promised to make America the “world capital for crypto and bitcoin,” and he’s already making good on that promise. Trump Media and Technology Group is reportedly close to acquiring the crypto trading firm Bakkt, and the Trump family launched their own crypto firm, World Liberty Financial, in September.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), now under Trump-aligned leadership, voted to approve bitcoin-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs), making it easier for everyday investors to enter the crypto market. These ETFs allow investors to bypass traditional crypto exchanges and invest in bitcoin as they would stocks—another move Democrats would have been too scared to make.

Trump has also tapped Tesla CEO Elon Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E.), a nod to the cryptocurrency Dogecoin. With Musk’s influence in the tech world and Ramaswamy’s entrepreneurial expertise, the administration is ensuring that America stays at the forefront of innovation.

Bitcoin’s success under Trump isn’t just about hype; it’s about smart policy and vision. As Trump removes bureaucratic roadblocks, investors are flocking to cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, driving demand and boosting prices. Critics like Warren Buffett—who famously called bitcoin a “bad ending”—are eating their words as crypto proves it’s here to stay.

While left-wing media outlets continue to moan about volatility, the truth is clear: Bitcoin is thriving, and it’s happening because of Trump’s bold leadership. Democrats, meanwhile, are still trying to figure out what cryptocurrency is—probably while blaming it for climate change.

Bitcoin’s rise to nearly $100,000 isn’t just a financial milestone; it’s a testament to the power of pro-growth policies. Trump’s embrace of innovation is fueling economic opportunity and positioning America as the leader in the crypto revolution. While Democrats wring their hands and worship outdated institutions, Republicans are paving the way for a future of freedom, prosperity, and decentralized finance.

Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha, has done it again, proving why he’s the undisputed king of investing. His Berkshire Hathaway recently made headlines with significant investments in two unexpected yet genius picks: Domino’s Pizza and Pool Corp. Yes, America’s favorite pizza chain and the nation’s top pool supply company are now Buffett-approved, and the markets are taking notice.

According to a filing with the SEC, Berkshire snagged 1.28 million shares of Domino’s, worth a cool $550 million by the end of the third quarter. Not stopping there, Buffett’s team also picked up over 400,000 shares of Pool Corp., the largest U.S. distributor of swimming pool equipment and supplies. Predictably, both stocks surged on the news, as investors once again followed the master’s lead.

Domino’s has long been the pizza titan of America, thanks to its streamlined delivery model and iconic branding. While the company’s third-quarter revenue fell short of expectations, its profitability exceeded Wall Street’s forecasts, demonstrating resilience in a challenging market. Analysts like those at Loop Capital are bullish, upgrading the stock amid signs of accelerating same-store sales. Clearly, Buffett knows a winner when he sees one.

Pool Corp., while less flashy, is just as strategic. With a dominant market share in a niche industry, it continues to rake in revenue through high-demand maintenance products. Even as new pool construction dips, Pool Corp. has carved out a reliable stream of income from pool owners nationwide. Oppenheimer recently raised its price target for the company, a move Buffett likely anticipated before anyone else.

Buffett’s investment philosophy is no secret: he loves companies with solid fundamentals, lasting appeal, and strong market positions. “A strong brand is potent stuff,” Buffett has said, and Domino’s and Pool Corp. embody that principle perfectly. Bill Gates summed it up best: “He doesn’t invest… unless the opportunity appears unbelievably good.”

Warren Buffett isn’t just investing in pizza and pools—he’s showcasing why capitalism works. The Oracle of Omaha sees opportunities where others see pizza boxes and chlorine tablets. While Democrats obsess over taxing the rich and redistributing wealth, Buffett is busy building it the right way: through smart, strategic investments in businesses that create jobs and value. That’s the kind of leadership America needs more of.

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) broke new ground last Thursday, surging past $98,800 before stabilizing, as the cryptocurrency market celebrated the announcement of SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s upcoming resignation. The timing couldn’t be more poetic—Gensler steps down on January 20, the same day Donald Trump takes the oath of office for his second term.

The rally is fueled by bullish sentiment surrounding the incoming Trump administration, which has made no secret of its pro-crypto stance. Bitcoin has skyrocketed 40% since Trump’s election win, repeatedly smashing milestones as investors eye the elusive $100,000 mark. The president-elect’s transition team is reportedly exploring the creation of a national bitcoin stockpile, a move that has crypto enthusiasts salivating.

Digital asset guru Mike Novogratz summed up the mood on Yahoo Finance: “All the guys around the table like our space. They believe in the digital asset world. They believe in blockchains and bitcoin, and so the whole energy of this administration is going to be so different than the Elizabeth Warren, Gary Gensler era.” Translation: Trump’s team gets it, unlike the Democrats, who think “blockchain” is something that happens in a parking lot dispute.

Adding fuel to the fire, reports suggest Trump Media & Technology Group is in advanced talks to acquire crypto trading platform Bakkt (BKKT). Such a move would not only cement the administration’s commitment to digital assets but also accelerate the adoption of crypto as a mainstream financial instrument.

Meanwhile, institutional interest in bitcoin continues to surge. BlackRock’s spot bitcoin ETF (IBIT) has seen its assets balloon by $13 billion since Trump’s victory, pushing its total assets past $40 billion. Options tied to IBIT began trading on Nasdaq this week, signaling growing confidence in the crypto space under Trump’s leadership.

The contrast couldn’t be starker. Under Gensler and the Democrats, crypto investors faced hostility and regulatory chokeholds. With Trump at the helm, the script has flipped. Instead of treating innovation as a threat, the incoming administration recognizes it as an opportunity. Democrats may scoff at bitcoin and cling to their outdated policies, but Trump’s pro-growth, pro-crypto approach is the future. This is the America-first strategy the country needs: embracing innovation, cutting red tape, and leaving the Democrats scratching their heads while bitcoin marches toward $100,000.

The IRS has announced changes that promise faster refunds and stronger identity theft protections for taxpayers starting with the 2025 filing season. But let’s not kid ourselves—when it comes to the IRS, every silver lining comes wrapped in red tape.

Here’s the deal: taxpayers filing electronically and claiming dependents can now proceed, even if those dependents have already been claimed on another return, provided they include an Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN). Previously, these cases required paper filing, which caused significant delays.

“This change will reduce the time for the agency to receive the tax return and accelerate the issuance of tax refunds for those with duplicate dependent returns,” the IRS said in its announcement. Translation: the IRS finally realized it’s 2023 and started acting like it.

The IP PIN—a six-digit code issued by the IRS—is supposed to ensure that only the rightful taxpayer can file using their Social Security number. That’s a good step toward combating fraud, especially since identity thieves have long exploited the IRS’s inability to keep up with modern scams.

To their credit, the IRS acknowledged the inefficiencies of their previous process. Requiring an IP PIN for duplicate dependent claims could prevent fraudulent filings or “honest mistakes,” a.k.a. your cousin “accidentally” claiming your kid as a dependent. But taxpayers need to act fast: the system for getting an IP PIN goes offline for annual maintenance on Nov. 23 and won’t return until January 2025. Because apparently, the IRS IT team needs six weeks to turn the lights off and on again.

While these changes apply to tax year 2024 and beyond, the IRS clarified that any duplicate dependent claims from prior years (2022, 2023) will still need to be filed on paper. That’s right, the same old snail-mail nightmare that ensures your refund will arrive just in time to fund next year’s tax bill.

Let’s not forget the obvious: the IRS is a government bureaucracy, and while this change might sound helpful, it’s also a stark reminder of how inefficient things have been. Republicans have long called for tax reform and a flatter, simpler system that would make identity theft and duplicate claims obsolete. Democrats, meanwhile, seem more interested in weaponizing the IRS against small businesses than fixing its inefficiencies. Maybe if the IRS spent less time auditing waitresses’ tips and more time streamlining processes, we wouldn’t need six-digit PINs to fend off fraudsters. But hey, at least they’re trying—just don’t hold your breath.

President-elect Donald Trump is about to do what career politicians from both parties have avoided for decades: stand up to China. His pledge to slap tariffs as high as 60% on Chinese goods has American businesses scrambling to adapt—and liberals wringing their hands over the possibility that people might have to pay a few extra bucks for their Amazon orders.

Trump’s bold trade agenda has already sent companies into overdrive. They’re stockpiling inventory, rerouting supply chains, and making plans to cut their reliance on China. Skincare entrepreneur Jason Junod recently dropped $50,000 to stock up on body brushes from China. “The biggest consideration is: Do we stay in China?” Junod asked. Well, Jason, here’s a pro tip: the sooner you cut ties with a communist regime notorious for slave labor, the better.

This isn’t Trump’s first rodeo with tariffs. Back in 2018, during his first term, companies also rushed to front-load imports to avoid looming costs. And guess what? The U.S. economy not only survived but thrived. Yet, liberals are once again predicting economic Armageddon, conveniently ignoring that Chinese imports accounted for just 14% of U.S. goods in 2023, down from 22% in 2017. Looks like Trump’s policies were already working.

Some businesses are wisely hedging their bets by diversifying supply chains. Boston-based Lucidity Lights, for example, is shifting production to Cambodia. Meanwhile, others, like San Francisco’s Stone Fleury, are doubling down on China and hoping to ride out the storm, proving that some people never learn.

Sure, companies like Charlotte-based Fine Fit Sisters worry that tariffs might drive up prices. “People like cheap things,” its owner lamented. Newsflash: People also like jobs, security, and not being at the mercy of a hostile foreign power.

This isn’t just about business; it’s about national security. For decades, China has undercut American manufacturing while lining the pockets of corporate elites who happily outsourced American jobs. Trump’s tariffs are a game-changer, finally putting America first in trade negotiations.

Democrats love to lecture about fairness and equality, but their policies have left America dependent on a regime with zero respect for human rights or international norms. Trump’s leadership will force businesses to innovate, strengthen the American economy, and stop the flow of billions to Beijing.

If that means paying a bit more for body brushes, so be it. After all, freedom isn’t free.

Boeing’s new CEO, Kelly Ortberg, isn’t sugarcoating the situation. In his first all-hands meeting, Ortberg reportedly told employees, “We are at a low here, folks.” Talk about a wake-up call. After years of production blunders, strikes, and a corporate culture seemingly more focused on infighting than competing with Airbus, Ortberg faces a steep climb to restore Boeing’s dominance in the aerospace world.

Let’s get this straight: Boeing is not some startup struggling to find its footing. It’s a historic giant in aviation, but lately, it’s been stumbling like a liberal politician on debate night. Ortberg nailed it when he called out the company’s culture, saying, “We spend more time arguing amongst ourselves than thinking about how we’re going to beat Airbus.” That’s not just a shot across the bow; it’s a cannonball.

Boeing has a backlog of over $500 billion in orders, including more than 5,400 commercial planes. Demand is sky-high for new, fuel-efficient jets. But despite all this opportunity, Boeing is burning through billions of dollars, saddled with delays, and can’t even dream of launching a new jet until it gets its production act together. That’s what happens when you take your eye off the ball—and when government policies make the climb even steeper.

Here’s where President-elect Donald Trump enters the picture. Ortberg revealed that he recently discussed tariffs with Trump, pointing out how a trade war with China could impact Boeing’s business. Boeing sells planes to Chinese airlines, but the U.S. doesn’t import any aircraft from China. If Trump’s tariff plans put pressure on China, it could create short-term challenges for Boeing—but in the long term, let’s not pretend this isn’t necessary. The Chinese Communist Party has been undermining American industry for decades, and Trump’s no-nonsense approach is what’s needed to level the playing field.

While Boeing is fighting to get back on track, its stock has plummeted nearly 44% this year, a stark contrast to the S&P 500’s 24% gain. Ortberg has his work cut out for him, but at least he seems to understand the problem: fix the culture, ramp up production, and stop the bleeding.

Meanwhile, liberal policies—like overregulation and economic strategies that put America last—have done little to help American giants like Boeing thrive. Trump’s agenda, focused on deregulation and fair trade, is precisely the kind of environment that allows businesses to rebuild and succeed. If Ortberg and Trump can align Boeing’s recovery with Trump’s pro-America economic policies, this American icon might just fly again.

Donald Trump, never one to shy away from shaking up the system, has made his latest power move by appointing Elon Musk to co-lead the new Department of Government Efficiency. Teaming up with biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, Musk’s mission is clear: gut the bloated bureaucracy, cut the fat, and save taxpayer dollars—something that sends shivers down the spines of career government bureaucrats and their union buddies.

Musk’s credentials for this role are ironclad, at least to anyone who doesn’t have their head buried in a Bernie Sanders manifesto. His track record of streamlining operations at companies like Tesla, SpaceX, and X (formerly Twitter) shows he’s all about results, even if it means ruffling a few feathers along the way. When Musk took over Twitter in 2022, he didn’t just trim the fat; he hacked through the whole thing like a man on a mission. Half the workforce? Gone. Free lunches and endless perks? Out. Remote work? Forget about it. Musk demanded what he called “a maniacal sense of urgency” from those who stuck around. In his world, there’s no room for slackers, and it’s this no-nonsense approach that Trump believes will bring some long-overdue discipline to Washington.

At Tesla, Musk built a culture where innovation thrives, but only if you can keep up. The company’s employee handbook famously tells workers to break traditional office rules if it means getting the job done better. He’s been known to demand the resignation of executives who don’t meet his high standards, a strategy that’s kept Tesla lean and ahead of the competition. SpaceX operates under the same ruthless efficiency, with Musk once cutting 10% of its workforce to ensure the company stayed on track. Meetings that waste time? Musk encourages employees to walk out of them.

Now imagine that level of discipline applied to the federal government, where inefficiency and waste are as common as lobbyists at a D.C. cocktail party. Trump’s bet is that Musk’s private-sector genius can bring the same focus to Washington that made Tesla a juggernaut and SpaceX a leader in space exploration. For a government that spends like a drunken sailor, Musk’s cost-cutting expertise could save taxpayers billions.

Of course, the left is already howling. They’ll say Musk’s methods are too harsh, too unkind, too “capitalist.” But let’s be honest: Democrats are perfectly fine with inefficiency—as long as it means more government jobs to hand out to their cronies. The idea of someone like Musk, who doesn’t care about playing nice with the swamp, terrifies them. And that’s exactly why he’s the right man for the job.

Trump knows what he’s doing. By bringing Musk into the fold, he’s making it clear that this administration is about results, not excuses. Washington better buckle up, because the Musk-Trump efficiency train is coming, and it’s not stopping for anyone who isn’t ready to work.

Consumer confidence among Republicans skyrocketed following Donald Trump’s decisive victory on Election Day, showing once again that conservatives know optimism and economic growth go hand in hand when competent leadership is at the helm. Meanwhile, Democrats saw a slight dip in sentiment after Kamala Harris’ embarrassing loss, though their numbers still managed to cling to positive territory. It’s almost as if even Democrats recognize deep down that Trump is better for the economy.

According to the Morning Consult Consumer Sentiment Index, overall consumer confidence hit a solid 100.6 on November 11. For context, anything above 100 is considered positive. Before the election, Republican sentiment was languishing at a dismal 83, likely reflecting the disastrous policies and economic mismanagement of the Biden administration. But after Trump’s victory, that number shot up to an impressive 107.6. Contrast that with Democrats, whose pre-election confidence was at a lofty 116. Even after watching Harris flounder, their sentiment only dropped to 100. Perhaps they’re in denial or, more likely, they’re benefiting from the confidence conservatives feel about the economic course correction under Trump.

This stark shift underscores a long-standing truth: when Republicans win, Americans get hopeful about their financial futures. Meanwhile, Democrats’ reactions tend to be more muted—whether out of cognitive dissonance or sheer stubbornness. Even a Stanford University study slated for release later this month backs this up, showing Republicans respond more strongly to who’s in the White House than Democrats do. As the study noted, “Republicans cheer louder when their party is in control and boo louder when their party is out of control.” Who can blame them? When Democrats are running the show, it’s hard to find much to cheer about unless you’re a bureaucrat or a big fan of higher taxes and reckless spending.

Some liberal economists, like Ben Harris of the Brookings Institution, are questioning whether consumer sentiment is even a reliable economic indicator anymore. Harris points out the increasing political polarization in how Americans view the economy. But maybe the real question should be: why do Democrats cling to failed policies that sink sentiment in the first place?

The bottom line is simple. When Trump is in charge, Americans feel confident. The stock market soars, jobs are created, and real people—working-class families and small business owners—feel hopeful again. The left may mock this renewed optimism, but deep down, even they know what works. Trump’s victory didn’t just restore consumer confidence—it’s a beacon of hope for a country tired of Democratic dysfunction. The message from voters is clear: we’re ready for four more years of winning.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!