Most Popular
Author

blake

Browsing

A letter warning that the AI technology being developed by top artificial intelligence firms might endanger humanity’s existence was signed by over 350 executives, researchers, and engineers.

According to the New York Times, more than 350 CEOs, researchers, and engineers from leading AI companies have signed an open letter to warn the world that the AI technology they are developing might pose a danger to humanity’s survival.

According to a statement made by the Center for AI Safety, a nonprofit group, “mitigating the risk of extinction concerning AI should be a top priority worldwide alongside additional societal-scale risks, such as global epidemics as well as nuclear war.” Top leaders from OpenAI, Google DeepMind, along with Anthropic are among the signatories.

Among the well-known signatories are Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, and Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. The letter was also signed by Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, the remaining two of the three researchers who received the Turing Award for their revolutionary work on neural networks.

The open letter is published at a time when concerns about the potential drawbacks of artificial intelligence are growing. Recent advancements in “large language models”—the type of AI system that is utilized by ChatGPT along with other chatbots—have sparked worries that AI could very soon end up being utilized at a scale to broadcast disinformation and propaganda, or that it could possibly displace millions of white-collar jobs.

Recently, Vice President Kamala Harris along with President Biden met with Altman, Hassabis, and Amodei to explore AI policy. After the meeting, Altman appeared before the Senate, warning that the hazards posed by highly developed AI systems were substantial enough to call for government action. He argued for government regulation of AI due to the potential threats it presents.

According to Dan Hendrycks, executive director of the Center for AI Safety, the open letter functioned as a “coming-out” for several company executives who had previously expressed worries about the risks associated with the technology they were developing, but only in private. “Even inside the AI community, there is a widespread assumption that there are only a small number of doomers,” according to Mr. Hendrycks. “However, a lot of individuals really voiced their worries about these things in private.”

Author: Steven Sinclaire

According to investigative writer Lee Fang, the largest tech corporations in the country continued to use the H-1B visa program to hire foreign workers while mass-firing American workers.

Since the beginning of the year, tens of thousands of Americans working in the technology sector have lost their employment, including 12,000 at Google, 10,000 at Microsoft, close to 20,000 at Amazon, and 10,000 from Meta Platforms, the company that owns Instagram and Facebook.

However, just a few weeks after announcing these layoffs, the same IT companies resumed employing foreign employees via the H-1B visa program, sometimes known as the “outsourcing visa” by many Americans.

Former employee of The Intercept Lee Fang reports:

“Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, announced his company’s plan to begin laying off 12,000 workers in a somber letter in January.”

“Only a month later, Pichai’s company submitted applications to bring low-wage foreign laborers to the United States to fill highly skilled tech positions. Google submitted several dozen applications for foreign employees to fill positions as user experience researchers, analytical consultants, software engineers, and other positions. The Google-owned self-driving vehicle business Waymo also submitted and accepted engineering visa applications. Several of the Google visas are intended for new hires, some of whom will begin work on August 17th.”

“According to recently published statistics from the Department of Labor, companies including Facebook/Meta Platforms, Zoom, Amazon, Salesforce, Microsoft, as well as Palantir have recently sought hundreds of H1-B foreign worker visas.”

The newly released data from Lee Fang is consistent with earlier research from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which was covered by Breitbart News this past month. That research discovered that the top 30 tech companies had announced a total of 85,000 layoffs while simultaneously hiring nearly 35,000 foreigners on H-1B visas to fill coveted white-collar American jobs.

We have been documenting the mistreatment of American white-collar workers as a consequence of the H-1B visa program for years. Approximately 650,000 foreign employees on H-1B visas are present in the country at any one time. Americans are often fired throughout the process and made to teach their foreign replacements.

“The majority of employers hire H-1B employees due to the fact that they are typically underpaid and are effectively contracted to the employer, instead of opting to the H-1B program as their last option when American employees can’t be found,” wrote EPI researchers Daniel Costa and Ron Hira.

“This is proven by government statistics revealing that technology firms continue bringing in H-1B workers in huge numbers while drastically lowering the total size of their workforces,” the authors add.

Republicans have been questioning the H-1B visa program for years, but nothing has been done to stop corporate outsourcing.

Author: Blake Ambrose

As a result of the Bidenflation, which one expert claims “may be here forever,” one in six retirees is considering their decision to stop being retired.

It will undoubtedly persist if Biden wins re-election.

In the far-left USA Today, Patrice Onawunka bemoans the possibility that the “financial insecurity” triggered by inflation—which was initially brought on by “reckless federal spending”—will last forever.

“People have made the connection between bad government decisions and negative economic results. Inflation accelerated as a result of the government spending roughly $2 trillion on subsidies to almost every family during a period of supply-chain disruptions and heightened labor shortages. It became worse as a result of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and other industrial setbacks.”

“In an effort to deceive Americans, particularly seniors, the Biden administration and legislative Democrats approved a climate change measure under the fake name Inflation Reduction Act. The most fundamental and important requirements of households—rising housing, food, or energy prices—were never addressed by the measure. Any climate benefits would take years to materialize and may be outweighed by additional family expenses for new electric cars, which might run into the tens of thousands of dollars. The cost of the green subsidies, though, is more than triple what the law’s proponents promised.”

What could be crueler than enacting a measure with the misleading name “Inflation Reduction Act” that accomplishes the exact opposite?

55 percent of those who have previously had to unretire said that it was because they needed more money.

The White House and corporate media continue to lie to us by promising that the inflation issue would pass quickly, yet nothing ever appears to change.

Everything is going up in price, but notably housing. Meanwhile, His Fraudulency Joe Biden is exerting every effort to keep inflation high. The way the federal government spends is like a drunken sailor, which cheapens money. Even worse, Biden has let countless millions of illegal immigrants enter our nation, which raises the price of housing by increasing demand for limited housing.

“Housing is a need,” Onwuka tells us, “unlike other discretionary expenses. Rent costs in America are rising, which disproportionately affects older folks and those with low incomes, particularly those on fixed budgets.” In addition, she states that “10 million households headed by individuals age 65 and over spend in excess of a third of their earnings on housing, and half of them pay more than 50%.”

Biden is purposefully penalizing Americans who have lived their life by the book, who have paid their taxes, saved money, and worked hard. He is placing the interests of millions of illegal aliens—who raise demand for everything and drive up prices for everything—above the interests of those Americans.

In a little over four years, I intend to retire. I’ll never be wealthy, but since I started my first 401K in 1994, I’ve been putting money aside for that day. I like both my job and my coworkers. That isn’t the problem. The dream is the problem… the desire to live out your third act with the freedom and resources to accomplish anything you choose. Similar actions are taken by many working Americans who save money and forgo immediate enjoyment in order to prepare for their elderly years. As a result, I find it difficult to understand what it must be like to enter a dream before having it destroyed. The anguish of coming out of retirement, going back to the grind, and having to face Monday mornings all over again escapes me.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

The market capitalization of retail giant Target fell by $10 billion in ten days, primarily as a result of the reaction over major LGBTQ+ PRIDE displays that included kid-friendly transgender clothes.

The New York Post reported this week that Target’s stock price was circling at $160.96 per share. However, there have been demands for a boycott when viral videos surfaced displaying “tuck-friendly” and “binding” swimming suits for children who identify as transgender, along with greeting cards honoring queerness in a display obviously intended for young children. The stock price fell to $138.93 per share ten days later.

$10 billion in losses resulting from a decline in value of $22 per share, or 14%, for the Minnesota-based corporation.

Calls for a boycott of the firm became stronger as soon as information of the retailer’s large PRIDE displays—which also featured LGBTQ+-themed baby clothes—began to circulate on social media channels.

Prior accounts state that Target concentrated on damage management right away. An “emergency call” was held by executives in an attempt to prevent what one source called a “Bud Light situation.”

At least in certain parts of the nation, the source told Fox News, “We were given 36 hours and ordered to remove all of our Pride material, the whole section, and transfer it into a portion that’s a third the size. You cannot have anything on mannequins or big signs from the front to the rear of the shop.

The brief collaboration between the iconic beer of Anheuser-Busch and transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney resulted in an instant reaction and precipitous sales declines, which the insider referred to as the “Bud Light situation.” Anheuser-Busch suffered a loss of billions in market value in the weeks after Mulvaney’s promotion, and at least two marketing officials involved in the collaboration have been given leaves of absence.

Anheuser-Busch reportedly lost upwards of $17.5 billion at the end of last week, according to Investors Business Daily, and the business resorted to allowing shops the option to resell out-of-date goods that were still on the shelves.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

A draft immigration and amnesty measure that accelerates the flow of foreign workers with visas into the white-collar jobs desired by many aspirant U.S. grads has been pushed by a number of GOP members working with Democrats.

Representatives Mara Elvira Salazar (R-FL), Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR), and Mike Lawler (R-NY) are the only three GOP lawmakers who support the combined amnesty along with the visa worker giveaway.

Along with amnesty for the millions of blue-collar immigrants, “what they are trying to do is further lower wages of white-collar workers,” said Kevin Lynn, founder of U.S. Tech employees, an advocacy organization representing U.S. grads, adding:

“It’s another downward spiral,” Nobody in the establishment appears to care that the visa worker migrants are forcing people out of employment and driving down pay in the medical field and all other white-collar occupations.”

On page 490 of the 493-page measure, Section 51312, titled “People with Doctorate Degrees in STEM fields Acknowledged as Individuals Possessing Extraordinary Ability,” contains the visa worker giveaway.

The reclassification guarantees that any number of foreign graduates may get renewed 0-1 work visas when they have “earned an advanced degree in a minimum of one of these fields, in a medical profession, or in another related program, through an institution of higher education within the United States.”

The measure also gives green cards to visa holders who have been employed or enrolled in school in the United States for ten years. Many white-collar firms, which includes Fortune 500 subcontractors, will be able to compensate visa employees with the reward of green cards -instead of money-if they work for ten years in the United States thanks to the “indentured worker” shift.

By offering more green cards for their family members, the law also essentially doubles the current awarding of green cards to 140,000 visa workers each year.

According to Lynn, the clauses are comparable to the gift that was concealed in a measure to promote domestic technological development. Midwest GOP Senators who want their fellow citizens to have technological professions halted the gift.

The new measure is beneficial to businesses, investors, visa workers, and illegal immigrants, but it is detrimental to Americans and their families.

Author: Blake Ambrose

Since the Labor Department started keeping track of the data in 1996, the number of foreign people possessing jobs in America has increased, while native-born Americans’ employment is falling, a trend that has been going on under President Biden.

According to statistics reported in the Wall Street Journal, the number of foreign-born employees holding employment in the United States reached a peak of more than 18% in 2022, the highest level in over 30 years.

Over 1.3 million native-born Americans entered the workforce last year, while 1.8 million more foreign-born individuals had employment or were seeking for work.

An economist told the Journal that “immigrants are a “buoy” for the labor force and are responsible for any actual improvements that have occurred,” said Elizabeth Crofoot, head economist at job market data company Lightcast.

The Biden administration has boosted the foreign-born workforce by 5% in only four years due to its primary focus on boosting total immigration to the U.S. via legal entry, unlawful entry, and foreign visa worker programs.

The proportion of native-born Americans in the labor force has decreased by 0.5% over the same time period. The unemployment rate for employees who were born abroad was also lower last year than it was for Americans, (3.4 percent vs. 3.7 percent).

A recent study from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) demonstrates that although a reduction in total immigration, both legal and illegal, increases earnings at a greater pace for non-college-educated Americans, mass unskilled immigration to the U.S. maintains wages sluggish for these Americans.Research by the CIS reveals:

“Real weekly wages for full-time, U.S.-born employees without a bachelor’s degree increased by 3.2% between the fourth quarters of 2016 and 2019. During this period, the overall immigrant population (legal and illegal) grew by an average of around 400,000 people each year, down from roughly 730,000 people per year from 2012 to 2016, when the incomes of those who were born in the United States but with less education actually decreased.”

Author: Steven Sinclaire

An amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants has been proposed by Rep. Maria Salazar (R-FL) along with other congressmen, with the backing of the US Chamber of Commerce, which represents some of the biggest international firms in the country.

Salazar joined others this week to offer a modified version of her amnesty proposal, which she first put up a year ago but failed to gather support amid record-breaking numbers of illegal immigrants.

As a supporter of Salazar, the Chamber of Commerce hailed the amnesty and the extension of foreign worker visas as successes for big businesses seeking to swell the American labor market to increase international competition, maintain low wages, and increase the number of customers for whose goods are sold.

According to Chamber of Commerce Vice President of Immigration Affairs Jon Baselice, “this proposal provides the kind of bipartisan solutions required to protect our borders, repair our asylum system, and assist American companies to fulfill their workforce needs to survive. We are eager to collaborate with the bill’s authors to see these urgently needed changes to our country’s flawed immigration system become law.”

The idea combines a biometric entry-exit system as a whole, a crackdown on asylum scams, as well as nationally obligatory E-Verify, among other things, with an amnesty for the country’s 11 to 22 million illegal immigrants who are able to pass a background check and settle back taxes.

Illegal aliens who submit applications for amnesty will have to pay $5,000 in restitution and be placed on a 12-year course to eventually obtain a green card and then become naturalized Americans after adhering to a set of requirements which includes learning English, meeting more restitution, and acquiring community service points.

The idea also raises the per-country immigration ceilings from the existing seven percent to fifteen percent while completely eliminating legal immigration limitations on the H-1B, H-2A, and H-2B visa categories.

In addition to issuing over a million temporary work visas to foreign people each year, the United States also distributes green cards to over a million legal immigrants. Legal immigration levels have increased the proportion of immigrants to the United States to the highest level ever, together with illegal immigration.

Given that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has made it plain time and time again that he would not accept any amnesty measures, it is doubtful that the plan will find support among House Republicans.

Author: Blake Ambrose

At Amazon, Facebook, and Google, tensions are rising among tech staff as layoffs, mandatory return-to-office policies, and other issues create unhappiness and discontent. The level of unrest at Amazon is so great that employees are apparently considering a walkout.

Layoffs, mandated return-to-work schedules, and other difficulties, according to The Washington Post, are raising tensions among tech employees at Google, Amazon, and Facebook (now referred to as Meta). Amazon workers at the Seattle headquarters of the corporation have declared intentions to organize a walkout a week after the corporation’s annual shareholder session on May 31. The strike is a response to many issues, including layoffs, the requirement to return to work, and concerns over Amazon’s climate promises.

Under the condition of anonymity, a Los Angeles-based Amazon worker who planned to take part said, “Morale seems like it is at a historic low. In meetings and one-on-one conversations with coworkers, there is a great deal of ambiguity and poor leadership. Being an Amazon employee right now is unnerving.”

Morale at Google and Facebook has fallen as a consequence of senior executives collecting huge bonuses as the businesses continue to lay off thousands of staff. Since last year, when increasing interest rates made it more difficult for entrepreneurs to get rapid capital, the tech industry has been experiencing difficulties. As a result, tech giants like Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft have announced layoffs that would result in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.

Google is enforcing return-to-office standards, which is raising employee stress since they fear the business would utilize these rules to make staff reductions without giving notice of layoffs.

As part of the third wave of a months-long staff reduction that will result in the loss of 10,000 positions, Facebook anticipates more layoffs this month. Employees have used anonymous message boards to express their anger with the company’s management.

Amazon has eliminated 27,000 positions since 2022. The company’s director of human resources rejected a petition that had been signed by more than 30,000 workers asking for a reconsideration of the return-to-office rule.

Author: Blake Ambrose

Following the dismissal of the entire IRS staff looking into the president’s son, a second IRS whistleblower in the Dept. of Justice’s (DOJ) investigation into Hunter Biden for tax fraud emerged, according to papers handed to Congress this week.

The IRS whistleblower, a global tax and also financial crimes special agent joins his supervisor in alleging that two political appointees of the Biden admin. within the Justice Dept. interfered politically with the investigation to thwart charges against Hunter Biden for tax offenses. In order to maintain some distance between the investigation and President Joe Biden, the initial whistleblower further said that Attorney General Merrick Garland declined to name a special prosecutor in the matter.

The House Ways and Means Committee will hold a historic hearing this week, and both whistleblowers plan to attend. They will discuss their worries over the DOJ’s suspected internal corruption.

After the DOJ reportedly instructed him and his team to be removed from the investigation, the second IRS whistleblower informed Congress. Since January 2020, the new whistleblower has been in charge of the inquiry and has worked with 12 other people.

The latest whistleblower said that on May 17, leadership cut his team out of the investigation after learning of “longstanding worries” about how the inquiry was handled. Apparently, the worries incensed a redacted “U.S. Attorney for the District…”

The chief prosecutor for the case is David Weiss, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, who was appointed by the Trump administration. Although Biden’s attorney general has acknowledged he must approve the charges, Garland said to Congress in March that Weiss had the independence to suggest revisions.

“On October 7, 2022, U.S. Attorney for the District of [redacted] learned that the IRS, as well as the FBI, had long-standing reservations about the case’s management… In a prosecutorial team call with the [redacted] USAO on Oct. 17, 2022, continued to express concerns; as a result, he and his IRS team were no longer invited to any additional prosecutorial team phone calls or meetings on the matter, effectively removing them from the case,” according to a report sent to Congress.

“For the last two years, my supervisor as well as myself have worked to get our top leadership’s attention about certain pressing investigation-related concerns. I have requested several meetings with our head and deputy chief, only to often be abandoned on an island with no communication from them,” the agent said in an email to IRS officials.

“It is highly alarming and unacceptable that top leadership from the IRS-Criminal inquiry has not participated in this inquiry. The response had too frequently been that we were isolated, rather than realizing the importance of ensuring close engagement and full support of the investigative team in this extremely sensitive case (even when I repeatedly complained that I was not being heard and that I felt that I couldn’t do my job well due to the actions taken by the USAO and DOJ, my concerns were disregarded by senior leadership).”

Author: Steven Sinclaire

According to Moody’s Analytics economic research, as rents throughout the country rise at a rate significantly greater than wage growth, housing for working as well as lower-middle-class Americans is becoming even more expensive.

The study reveals that although U.S. rentals have increased by about 135 percent since 1999, wages have only increased by roughly 77 percent.

According to research by Moody’s, which has been monitoring the average rent-to-income ratio in the United States for over 25 years, “last year, the share of American family earnings required for renting an average-priced apartment surpassed the rental-burdening 30 percent threshold for the very first time.”

“Rising mortgage rates kept potential homebuyers in their flats by making it too expensive for many people to purchase a home. As a consequence, rental demand soared and prices skyrocketed.”

“The only U.S. metro region where rent accounted for more than 30% of a household’s monthly paycheck in 1999 was New York. There, an average-priced apartment would have cost a family with a median salary about 54% of their take-home pay.”

“By the conclusion of 2022, rent burdens in seven metros were over 30 percent, with six of those metros being on the East Coast.”

Specifically stated in the research, “increased demand has placed pressure on rental prices and made it difficult for renters to come across affordable housing.”

A portion of this rise in demand can be attributed to the country’s decades-long massive immigration policy, which annually admits more than a million legal immigrants along with a million foreign workers with visas, in addition to the hundreds of thousands of newly arrived illegal aliens who joined the population and require housing.

According to Breitbart News, 333.3 million people lived in the United States in 2022. More than 80% of that population expansion may be attributed to legal immigration, which former President George H.W. Bush dramatically increased in the early 1990s and has not decreased since.

The U.S. population has increased by over 16 million since 1999 as a result of immigration.

Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH) said on Twitter that “housing expenses for average Americans increase when too many individuals are admitted. Stop Biden’s border crisis, and end his assault on home affordability.”

Even proponents of mass immigration have acknowledged that the program raises housing costs, particularly for Americans in the working and lower middle classes.

Mass immigration is “devastating for housing costs,” New York Magazine said last week, following other mainstream media publications like the New York Times as well as Wall Street Journal in making this admission.

Similar to this, a report by the Michael Bloomberg-funded New American Economy organization detailed how the decades-long immigration of tens of millions of people contributed to a $3.7 trillion increase in housing costs for the next generation of homeowners, but it misrepresented the amount as the development of “housing wealth.”

Author: Scott Dowdy

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!