Most Popular
Author

blake

Browsing

Donald Trump may break his own record as the wealthiest president ever elected when he runs again in 2024, according to a Bloomberg analysis. Trump has become significantly richer since leaving the White House and is less in debt.

Bloomberg estimates Trump’s current fortune at $3.1 billion, up $500 million from 2021 and higher than his $3 billion net worth when elected in 2016. This suggests he suffered economic setbacks while serving as president.

Bloomberg reports:

“Trump’s higher net worth comes as his businesses show resilience despite a gloomy real estate market. His relocation to Florida after the White House coincided with an economic boom there which greatly improved finances for his famous Mar-a-Lago and Doral properties. Revenues at his other golf courses also surged over 50% since 2019. And after selling his Washington hotel and paying down debts, Trump now has more available cash and less leverage than in the past ten years.”

Trump’s son Eric, executive VP of the Trump Organization, said “The company has never been better, we have the most cash and the lowest debt. We are in a fantastic spot.”

Trump himself estimates his net worth even higher at $4.5 billion in 2021 financial statements. This is below his 2016 estimate of $5.8 billion, again implying financial sacrifices while president.

New York state has a much lower estimate of Trump’s net worth at $2.6 billion in 2021 in its litigation against him. This includes an improbably low $27.6 million value for Mar-a-Lago, which Bloomberg estimates is worth $240 million currently.

The conflicting valuations show Trump has regained wealth since his term ended. While president, he appears to have taken financial hits perhaps due to distractions of serving.

But estimates vary widely on Trump’s exact net worth. He maintains it is over $4 billion. Others put it closer to $3 billion or even below $3 billion.

Regardless of the precise figure, Trump has clearly rebounded financially since leaving office. By most accounts, he is now wealthier than when first elected or anytime during his presidency. If current trends continue, Trump could break his own record as the wealthiest president in history when he likely runs again in 2024.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is hiking the country’s already high immigration intake, worsening housing costs, crashing birth rates, dragging productivity, and eroding public support despite the damage.

Trudeau’s 2023 intake of 465,000 will rise to 485,000 in 2024 and 500,000 yearly after, per the immigration minister. More “newcomers” are supposedly needed to build housing and offer healthcare for past arrivals.

But the government also hides migration by not counting 700,000 supposed “short-stay” foreign students entering in 2023’s first half. With this, over 1 million actually entered last year, inflating Canada’s population to 40 million.

Long-term, Trudeau’s plan would annually add five permanent migrants for every four Canadian high school graduates, not counting “students.”

The policy aids investors but does vast damage. Trudeau’s immigration has produced a “demand shock” for housing, dramatically spiking costs beyond what Canadians can pay. In September 2023, the average home price was $475,000 US dollars while half of Canadians earn under $50,000 yearly.

“The dream of homeownership is quickly turning into a nightmare,” said researcher Sean Simpson, with two-thirds of renters now abandoning hopes of buying homes.

An economist stated housing is getting even less affordable and “shared beds” are now being rented out monthly in Toronto due to severe shortages.

The crisis has sparked increased homelessness. News articles spotlight homeless workers living in makeshift camps who were priced out of apartments on regular incomes.

Many migrants are even returning home, unable to secure housing. But Trudeau has blamed local governments instead.

The flood of new workers allows businesses to profit via low-tech, unproductive jobs instead of investing in innovation. Canada’s declining productivity will likely hinder taming inflation, necessitating more rate hikes despite economic slowing.

Workers’ wages are also taking a hit in real terms due to high inflation. Younger Canadians face stagnating incomes over their working lives rather than rising prosperity.

Rapid population growth is also crashing birth rates as home costs become prohibitive for family formation. The 2022 birth rate hit a historic low, with over a third of youth now saying they’re foregoing children because housing is unattainable.

Multiple polls show Canadians believe immigration is fueling housing unaffordability. Support for current high levels has plunged while the view it’s “too much” has surged.

Yet the business lobby wants even higher intake, with banks profiting from construction lending and growth. Politicians also back acceleration, unwilling to cut access to cheap labor and consumer growth.

The U.S. would benefit from adopting Canada’s “nimble” immigration approach, says the Biden administration. Since 2021, Biden has imported at least 4 million migrants and 2 million visa workers, following Canada’s investor-first playbook.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

President Biden’s agencies will bring in almost 65,000 H-2B visa workers for US jobs as millions of Americans remain out of work.

Late Friday, DHS and Labor announced allowing businesses to bring in 65,000 additional H-2B workers for landscaping, construction, meatpacking, and other industries.

Businesses can already annually import 66,000 H-2B workers for non-agricultural jobs. Trump routinely approved more, which Biden is also doing.

Specifically, 20,000 H-2B visas will go to workers from certain Central American countries, the rest to those previously approved.

Annually, about 1.2 million immigrants get green cards and 1.4 million foreign workers enter on visas.

Meanwhile, illegal immigration adds hundreds of thousands to the labor force yearly, many given work permits.

As Breitbart has chronicled, the H-2B program is rife with abuse.

This worker expansion comes as research shows 44.3 million American-born adults 16-64 are not working – ten million more than in 2000 – not counting the unemployed.

Meanwhile, foreign workers hit their highest share in almost 30 years at over 18% of the workforce, with 30 million US jobs.

Critics argue these visa increases take jobs from Americans needing them most. With labor shortages in some sectors, employers should raise wages to attract domestic workers, they contend.

Instead, businesses addicted to cheap foreign labor get visas rubber-stamped, undercutting US workers. The program suppresses wages overall, critics say.

Advocates counter visa workers fill vital jobs Americans won’t take. They claim the programs help businesses survive and boost economic growth.

Ensuring adequate protections for US and foreign workers is crucial, advocates argue. When properly regulated, they assert the programs benefit everyone.

With political gridlock on immigration reform, presidents rely on visas for foreign workers. But this band-aid ignores deeper problems.

Long-term, training more Americans for in-demand jobs is essential. Immigration should align with economic needs, not undermine workers.

Absent reforms, these visa increases will likely continue, benefiting business at a cost for many labor advocates argue should not be ignored.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

Prices of Halloween candy have gone up by more than 10% for two years in a row, and they’ve gone up a huge 13% since October of last year.

A company that tracks store prices says that the 13% average price hike for candy is over twice as much as the 6% rise in prices for other groceries. Datasembly reviewed sales data from more than 150,000 shops in more than 30,000 zip codes, which is more than 200 different retail brands.

Just the price of chocolate has gone up by almost 12%.

The nationwide candy inflation of this year is really not as bad as the 20% spike in candy prices that occurred between October 2021 and October 2022.

Prices for candy are going up, especially in states on the East Coast.

The prices went up by 14.7% in Vermont, 14.2% in Maine, and 14.2% in the state of Pennsylvania.

In other places, prices have gone up less. In Ohio, they went up 8.1%, in Michigan they went up 7.5%, and in Alaska they went up 7.1%.

A mixed bag of 375 miniature M&Ms, Twix, and Snickers can be bought at Walmart for $49.98.

A variety pack of eighteen full-size Snickers, Twix, Three Musketeers, and Milky Way can be purchased at Target for $16.99.

Numerator polled 4,500 individuals across the US with regard to their Halloween plans and found that approximately a third planned to purchase store-brand or just value candy to provide trick-or-treaters this Halloween.

Also, only 61% of respondents said they were going to be celebrating Halloween this year, which is down from 65% last year. At the time of the poll, though, some people were still not sure.

This week, Hershey, the company that makes chocolate, admitted that price increases are lowering demand.

In the past seven quarters, Hershey has increased its pricing by a minimum of 7%. Additionally, the company’s candy sales volumes in North America decreased by 1% from July to September.

“We are aware that consumers prioritize value and affordability even in times of tight budgets,” Michele Buck, president of Hershey’s, stated while on a conference call with some investors this week.

“Even though candy price hikes have slowed down, the rise over the last year will add to the record inflation seen last year,” Datasembly stated in its study. “Manufacturers hope that candy will continue to do well with consumers’ extra money even though people are growing more selective and cautious with their money because of the economy.”

People in the US have been very worried about inflation since the pandemic, especially when it comes to the cost of food, gas, and other basics.

A lot of Southern California counties saw gas costs go through the roof again in September, with an average of more than $6 a gallon.

The Alliance for Consumers released a new study this past week that said the rules and laws of the Biden administration might have caused American homes to cost an extra $9,000. This is because of price increases for washing machines, cars, gas stoves, and dishwashers.

Author: Steven Sinclaire

Representative Pat Fallon, a Republican from Texas, is pushing for a bill that would make it illegal for Congress members as well as their spouses to trade individual stocks.

The Daily Caller shared a copy of the plan. The text of the bill says that politicians as well as spouses would not be able to purchase or sell a “covered financial instrument,” known as a bond “as outlined in section 3(a) in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.”

According to the legislation, several financial instruments would not be considered “covered financial instruments,” including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, bonds, U.S. Treasury bills, and notes, as well as “any investment fund placed in a State, Federal, or local government employee retirement plans.”

As compensation for their work, a spouse of a member of Congress may receive a “covered financial instrument” from their spouse’s primary occupation during the duration of their employment in that occupation, according to the measure’s language, which goes into effect one year after the spouse of the member of Congress starts working in that primary occupation.

The people who broke the rules would have to pay a fine of either “$25,000 for each violation” or the value associated with the financial object that was purchased or sold, whichever fine is higher.

“There’s no doubt that some members want to use their power to get rich and help their families. Still, more individuals make honest errors when they try to figure out the often-confusing reporting rules. The media has turned into a cottage business that often doesn’t talk about bad players but instead criticizes innocent mistakes for political reasons.” Fallon stated to the Daily Caller, “To put an end to every bit of this, we should just pass a law that makes it abundantly obvious that members of Congress are not allowed to trade individual stocks at all.”

“To get people to trust Congress again, the Insider Trading Prevention Act is a very important first step. This is straightforward, easy to comprehend, and will get rid of all good faith mistakes, but more importantly, egregious self-promotion and insider trading,” he told the source.

Author: Scott Dowdy

DoorDash has added a new feature to its app that asks customers to tip when they place their order instead of when the food is delivered. This is to avoid delays. The business says that orders without a pre-tip will probably take longer and come with cold fries and warm drinks.

TechCrunch reports that DoorDash has added a new feature to its app that encourages customers to tip ahead of time. The company says this is to balance the needs of its employees with those of its customers. Customers who don’t want to tip when they place their orders now see a pop-up message telling them that their orders might take longer to arrive if they don’t tip.

The message asks, “Are you positive you want to continue? Orders without a tip could take longer for them to be delivered.” The current project seems to be a part of a larger plan to improve the delivery process so that everyone has a good experience, including buyers, delivery drivers (called Dashers), and retailers.

Jenn Rosenberg, a spokeswoman for DoorDash, explained why this change was made. “A Dasher goes the extra mile each day to help people find the best in their areas.” Rosenberg stated, “That is the reason we encourage consumers to give a tip to show their thanks.” She also said that Dashers are self-employed and can choose which orders to take or not take based on how valuable they think they are. This makes orders without tips less appealing.

In the gig economy, the idea of pre-tipping is becoming more popular. Pre-tipping appears to be a way to make sure delivery drivers get paid enough for their work, which makes them more likely to take orders quickly. This strategy is especially important because of DoorDash’s past payment problems, which caused them to change their payment procedure in 2019.

As Breitbart News revealed before, DoorDash along with other delivery services had been keeping the tips customers believed they were providing to drivers while only giving a small part of each tip to the drivers themselves.

Author: Scott Dowdy

Germany has been rushing to shut down the traditional foundation of its national power system, which includes coal and nuclear power. But at this point, the finance minister of the coalition government says the random date of 2030 as the end of coal use may be wrong.

German Finance Minister Christian Lindner has questioned the wisdom of rushing toward a future without coal when there isn’t a reliable source of energy that can replace it. He is worried that requiring plants to shut down will not help the market during a time when energy bills are already at record highs. Before the earlier deadline of 2038 that had been agreed upon, Germany made a commitment in 2022 to completely phase out power generated from coal by 2030.

Lindner was questioned by the west-German daily paper Kolner Stadt-Anzeiger why he was against the support plan that was being talked about for assisting German industry. Part of this plan would have been to subsidize energy to make German companies more competitive on the world market. For his part, the liberal official said that the issue with a subsidy is the fact that taxpayers will pay for it in the end, whether it’s by means of a tax or a subsidy, arguing that the best solution is to make energy cheaper by increasing supply.

He went even further and talked about how pushing for green goals can limit supply. “To put this simply, energy is overpriced when it becomes scarce,” he claimed. “That’s why power plants shouldn’t be shut down right now. Don’t think about getting rid of power generated from coal in 2030 until it’s proven that energy has become available and cheap. This date doesn’t change anything about the environment because, according to European rules, the CO2 emissions that were saved in Germany can be made again in Poland, for example.”

According to Lindner, Germany should try to get more energy from renewable sources. He also said that burning greater quantities of natural gas became part of the answer, but that “money can’t solve physical scarcity.” He said that Angela Merkel’s government was to blame for the closing of coal plants and Germany’s nuclear power plants, even though the last nuclear plants shut down earlier this year under the direction of the government he is in now.

It seems like Lindner waved off criticism of that choice by saying it was already made and shouldn’t be talked about again. He also said it wasn’t worth crying over spilled milk.

Bijan Djir-Sarai, a member of Lindner’s party, said earlier this year that shutting down the last nuclear plants was a “strategic mistake” because the engines continued to prove useful to the country. They were supposed to shut down for good in 2022, but after Russia attacked Ukraine, they were allowed to stay open longer.

Author: Blake Ambrose

The platform was bought privately by Elon Musk for $44 billion a year ago, but it is now only valued at $19 billion. The value comes from how the company figures out a worker’s equity plan.

Fortune says that Elon Musk’s X/Twitter has introduced a new stock plan for employees. The plan gives employees restricted stock units (RSUs), with each of the shares worth $45. Based on these numbers, the company is only valued at $19 billion, which is about 55% less than Elon Musk’s original buying price of $44 billion.

Even worse losses have been suffered by other groups that helped Musk take over. According to Axios, Fidelity put $300 million into Musk’s plan to buy out Twitter. The company has since written down the value of the investment by a shocking 65%.

The Wall Street Journal says that the banks that gave Musk billions of dollars to finish the deal also expect to lose money:

“After having the debt for an entire year—which is an eternity within the corporate-finance world—the financial institutions, which were hoping they would be able to sell it before Labor Day, are currently making preparations for an attempt to unload at least a portion of it,” sources said.

“They must first get a rating from organizations such as Moody’s and S&P, which is often a quality seal requirement for investors like mutual funds as well as loan managers. In the event X gets a bad credit rating, it will be hard for financial institutions to sell the debt to a larger number of investors without losing even more money than they expected.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that X/Twitter is going through a time of “negative cash flow.” Musk said that this financial stress was caused by a number of things, including a big drop of 50 percent in advertising income and a lot of debt.

Author: Scott Dowdy

Today, President Biden signed an order to regulate the artificial intelligence (AI) business. The order says that AI must promote “civil rights” and “equity,” which is the left’s concept for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

The White House says it will send advice to landlords, government contractors, federal welfare programs, and other groups on how to use AI in a way that is less likely to be biased against people of color or other groups. Furthermore, enforcement measures will be taken. According to the White House fact sheet on the executive order, “training, technical help, as well as coordination involving the Dept. of Justice and the Federal civil rights offices on the most effective methods for the investigation and prosecution of civil rights offenses related to AI” will be made available.

A major focus will also be put on utilizing AI in the criminal justice system, with plans to create “the most effective practices on the use of AI in risk assessments, surveillance, crime forecasting and predictive policing, parole and probation, pretrial release and detention, and forensic analysis.”

There is an unsaid fear that letting AI fully look at certain kinds of data, like crime records and credit scores, could lead to unfair results for some groups. This worry is at the heart of the academic field of machine learning fairness, which is a mix of critical race theory together with computer science. Breitbart News has written a lot about this topic before, and this portion of the executive order appears to build on it. In the end, companies that use AI may sometimes have to stop them from coming to too exact conclusions so that they don’t break U.S. civil rights laws, especially the concept of disparate effect.

There are a lot of other important things in the executive order as well. AI companies will have to use watermarks to ensure that people can tell the difference between content made by AI (especially photos and movies) and content not made by AI.

It also gets the government involved in testing AI for safety. The Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) will set up an “AI Safety and Security Board” to make sure that key infrastructure sectors comply with those safety requirements. The National Institute of Technology and Standards will come up with rules for testing the safety of newly developed AI systems.

Given DHS’s main role in censoring and targeting Americans, the fact that it is involved in regulating AI may worry people who fight for online freedom. In the past, DHS sub-agencies have used cybersecurity as an excuse to block “disinformation” and make plans for “deradicalizing” Americans who are conservative.

The Departments of Energy as well as Homeland Security are also going to “deal with cybersecurity risks, chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats, as well as AI systems’ threats to critical infrastructure” in terms of security. The White House brief also says that agencies that fund projects in the life sciences will set standards for biological synthesis projects. This is to make sure that AI doesn’t make it easier to make biological materials that are harmful.

Author: Scott Dowdy

The Republican senator from Missouri, Josh Hawley, wants the Energy Department’s IG to look into whether Secretary Jennifer Granholm was lying to Congress when she said she didn’t hold individual stocks, but she really did.

Granholm testified before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in June, as Breitbart News revealed, admitting that she and her spouse had personally owned equities in the corporations under her department’s jurisdiction as recently as May.

A little over a month before the shocking admission, Granholm lied to the committee and said she only owned mutual funds and not any individual stocks.

“Madam Secretary, do you hold individual stocks?” Granholm said, “No, I’m invested in mutual funds,” in response to Hawley’s question.

At this point, Hawley wants the Energy Department’s inspector general to look into Granholm’s stock holdings “as well as her frequent violations of federal ethics laws.”

“I am writing to officially ask that you begin to look into Secretary Granholm’s false statements. I also ask that you check to see if the Department is following existing ethics laws and see if senior officials hold shares in companies that they regulate,” Hawley writes.

“Secretary Granholm’s most recent breach of federal securities laws is the most recent in a string of unethical actions. Before she lied to the Committee, Secretary Granholm had broken federal rules nine times about telling people about her stocks. Then, when I asked Secretary Granholm a total of three times during her April 20, 2023, hearing before the Committee, she said that she no longer owned any stocks. It wasn’t true. She had shares in six different companies at the time.”

“Rather than being transparent about her ongoing stock ownership or her deceptive statements, Secretary Granholm postponed selling the equities she still had until May 18, 2023. After a few more weeks, she told the Energy Committee that what she had told us was not true.”

“There are other officials at the Energy Department besides Secretary Granholm who have engaged in stock trading throughout their tenure. We found out in February of this year that government workers in the Energy Department own stocks in companies that deal with energy. Along with your investigation into Secretary Granholm, I also ask that you check the ethics of Department of Energy workers to see if they are following the rules about owning individual stocks.”

“Senior government officials shouldn’t trade stocks, especially stocks in companies that they are in charge of. People don’t trust our government or the rule of law as much as they used to because Energy Department employees keep breaking the rules of ethics.”

Granholm acknowledged owning equities when the Wall Street Journal revealed that “one-third of the Energy Department’s top officials… held stocks related to their agency’s work,” which prompted federal ethics officers to alert them to federal conflicts of interest regulations.

Author: Blake Ambrose

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!