Most Popular
Author

dmgadmin

Browsing

DeepSeek AI, a Chinese artificial intelligence chatbot, is taking the digital world by storm—and not in a good way. Released just eight days ago, the app has skyrocketed to the top of Apple Store downloads, shaking up the tech industry, triggering an investor panic, and tanking AI-related stocks. But here’s the real kicker—this app isn’t just another AI toy. It’s a dangerous tool of information warfare, and the world is falling right into China’s trap.

The financial fallout was immediate. Built on a cheaper system that requires fewer advanced chips, DeepSeek AI’s success sent AI-related stocks plummeting. The hardest hit? None other than Nvidia, the chip-making giant that just suffered the biggest single-day loss in U.S. history—nearly $600 billion in market value wiped out overnight. If there was ever a sign that America’s tech dominance is under siege, this is it.

But let’s talk about the bigger threat. This chatbot is designed to deceive. Unlike OpenAI’s ChatGPT, DeepSeek AI initially seemed less censored, a surprising change from what we’ve come to expect from Chinese tech. A friend of Glenn Beck put it to the test, asking for a list of history’s worst mass murderers. At first, the bot responded correctly—naming Genghis Khan and Mao Zedong, the latter being responsible for tens of millions of deaths under communist rule. But then, like a scene out of Orwell’s 1984, the answer disappeared.

The bot suddenly refused to acknowledge its own response. When pressed, it gaslighted the user, claiming it had never mentioned Mao or Genghis Khan at all. Screens went blank, answers were erased, and history was rewritten in real-time. The moment someone tried to expose the truth, the app doubled down—deleting screenshots of its own statements and feigning ignorance.

This isn’t just a glitch. This is controlled narrative manipulation on a terrifying scale. If China can tweak AI responses in real-time to erase history and replace truth with propaganda, imagine what else they can do. With millions already using this app, how long before it becomes a tool for global indoctrination? How long before American students, employees, and even policymakers unknowingly rely on an AI system programmed by the Chinese Communist Party to feed them state-approved information?

When Glenn himself tested the AI and asked about the CCP’s influence on private companies, the bot did what any good communist tool would do—nothing. It refused to answer. The silence said everything.

This is not just another AI competitor. DeepSeek AI is an information weapon, designed to infiltrate and reshape global discourse while making China’s Big Brother-style control over knowledge a reality. Meanwhile, America’s tech industry reels from financial chaos, leaving the CCP laughing all the way to the bank.

Americans need to wake up. The real battle for truth isn’t just happening in the media or in classrooms—it’s happening in the very AI that will soon power every search engine, every virtual assistant, and every piece of information we consume. China is playing the long game, and if the West doesn’t start taking this seriously, the next generation won’t even know what the truth looks like.

Do not download this app. Do not trust it. And most importantly—do not underestimate how quickly the CCP is trying to control the future of information itself.

In a decisive first-week move, President Donald Trump signed an executive order forcing federal employees back to their offices, putting an end to the telework free-for-all that’s been dragging on since COVID-19. Unsurprisingly, government workers are melting down on social media, proving once again how out of touch they are with the real world.

Why It Matters

The federal government’s “return to office” (RTO) policy will impact over 3 million government employees who have been enjoying the cushy benefits of remote work. With Trump’s order, these workers will have to do what the rest of America already does—show up to work in person.

What To Know

Trump’s executive order, signed on January 20, mandates that heads of all federal agencies take the “necessary steps” to end remote work and require employees to report to their duty stations full-time. While agency heads can grant exemptions where they see fit, the White House has been clear: it’s time for bureaucrats to get back to business.

The order marks a major shift from the Biden-era policies that coddled government employees with generous telework arrangements, even as private-sector workers returned to the office long ago. The response? Pure panic. Reddit threads and Twitter posts from self-identified federal workers are filled with complaints about commuting, doctor’s appointments, and childcare.

Translation: They don’t want to do what the rest of working America does every day.

Who Has to Show Up?

The order applies across the board, but specific agency implementation remains unclear. According to May 2024 data, around 10% of federal civilian employees (approximately 228,000 workers) were fully remote. Another Pew Research Center survey found that 75% of eligible workers across industries were still taking advantage of hybrid or remote options.

What Leaders Are Saying

Trump addressed the issue head-on, stating, “If people don’t come back to work, come back into the office, they’re going to be dismissed.” Elon Musk echoed the sentiment on X (formerly Twitter), adding, “It’s not fair that most people have to come to work to build products or provide services while Federal Government employees get to stay home.”

But, of course, the big-government unions aren’t happy. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, predictably complained, claiming that RTO policies “undo decades of progress” in workplace flexibility. Translation: Government workers might have to be held accountable.

The Future of WFH

Critics of the order are already warning of mass resignations and recruitment struggles, as if working a normal office job is some kind of punishment. The reality? The private sector adapted long ago, and now it’s time for the federal government to do the same. With millions of hardworking Americans showing up to work daily, why should bureaucrats be any different?

The Trump administration is simply setting the standard: If you want to work for the American people, you actually have to show up. And if that’s too much to handle, maybe Washington wasn’t the right place for you after all.

President Trump has launched an unprecedented federal spending freeze, placing trillions of taxpayer dollars in limbo as his administration undertakes a sweeping review of government programs. The freeze, announced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), spares Social Security, Medicare, and a select few programs, but halts funding for many others, including Section 8 housing assistance and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

Set to begin Tuesday at 5 p.m., this bold move is already sparking fierce debates about the limits of presidential authority and the future of federal spending.

Rooting Out Waste and Left-Wing Agendas
According to OMB Acting Director Matthew Vaeth, the spending pause is part of Trump’s broader effort to realign federal spending with his America First agenda. Agencies have until February 10 to report back to OMB on specific programs subject to the freeze, after which guidance will be issued on whether funding will be reinstated.

“The use of federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and Green New Deal social engineering policies is a waste of taxpayer dollars,” Vaeth stated. He added that federal resources should instead focus on improving the lives of ordinary Americans.

The freeze targets programs tied to left-wing agendas, such as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which Trump has already ordered agencies to dismantle. While some administrative functions required by law will continue, new funding awards will be paused unless exceptions are granted on a case-by-case basis.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a rebranded version of the United States Digital Service led by Elon Musk, is tasked with auditing federal agencies for waste and inefficiency.

Democrats Cry Foul
Unsurprisingly, Democrats erupted in outrage. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the freeze “chaos,” warning of missed payrolls and disrupted services for charities, universities, and local governments. Senate Appropriations Committee member Patty Murray and House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro condemned the move as “breathtaking, unprecedented, and devastating.”

Critics argue the freeze challenges the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which limits a president’s ability to withhold funds appropriated by Congress. OMB Director-Designate Russ Vought, a staunch supporter of budget cuts, has called the law unconstitutional.

Trump’s Plan to Cut Spending
This freeze is the latest step in Trump’s push to slash government spending and eliminate unnecessary programs. On his first day back in office, Trump emphasized his commitment to fiscal discipline by renaming and empowering DOGE to cut federal bloat.

With the national debt now at $36 trillion and the 2024 budget deficit topping $1.8 trillion, Trump’s bold measures aim to rein in reckless spending and prioritize programs that align with his America First vision.

The battle lines are drawn, and the legal and political ramifications of this freeze are likely to dominate headlines in the weeks to come.

President Donald Trump delivered a strong message to Colombia on Sunday, imposing sweeping retaliatory tariffs and sanctions after Colombian President Gustavo Petro refused to allow deportation flights carrying illegal migrants to land in his country. Trump’s move, aimed at upholding America’s sovereignty and border security, comes as part of his administration’s intensified crackdown on illegal immigration, declared a national emergency shortly after his inauguration.

Trump announced the immediate imposition of 25% tariffs on Colombian goods, with the rate set to rise to 50% within a week if the standoff isn’t resolved. He also unveiled a series of punitive measures, including travel bans, visa revocations for Colombian government officials and their allies, expanded border inspections, and financial sanctions. “These measures are just the beginning,” Trump said on Truth Social. “We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States.”

BREAKING: TRUMP IMPOSES MASSIVE TARIFFS ON COLOMBIA, AMERICAN PRICES TO GO UP.

[image or embed]

— Aaron Parnas (@aaronparnas.bsky.social) January 26, 2025 at 2:13 PM

Colombian President Gustavo Petro responded with bluster, issuing retaliatory 25% tariffs on U.S. goods while doubling down on his refusal to accept deportation flights unless migrants are treated with what he calls “dignity.” Petro has demanded that deportees be flown on civilian planes and not placed in restraints, a condition the Trump administration has no intention of entertaining. Trump’s use of military planes to transport deportees underscores his administration’s commitment to treating illegal immigration as a matter of national security—a stark departure from the leniency seen during the Biden years.

The economic stakes are high. U.S.-Colombia trade amounted to $53.5 billion in 2022, with crude oil, coffee, and fresh-cut flowers among Colombia’s top exports to the U.S. Trump’s tariffs could impact everyday prices for Americans, particularly on items like gasoline, coffee, and Valentine’s Day bouquets. Crude oil shipments from Colombia account for about one-third of its exports to the U.S., ranking the nation fourth among America’s crude suppliers. Colombia also provides 27% of unroasted coffee imports, making the potential ripple effects significant for consumers.

Petro’s posturing echoes similar complaints from Mexico and Brazil, which have also objected to the Trump administration’s use of military planes for deportations. But Trump isn’t backing down, making it clear that America will no longer tolerate foreign governments refusing to take back their criminals. While Petro and his ilk try to frame this as a humanitarian issue, Trump’s decisive actions underscore the importance of putting American safety and sovereignty first.

The left will likely seize on potential price increases for everyday items as a way to criticize Trump’s hardline approach. But these critics conveniently ignore the bigger picture: an open border benefits no one except criminals and human traffickers. By holding foreign leaders accountable, Trump is not only securing America’s borders but also reasserting the country’s global standing. For too long, the U.S. has played the doormat, bending to the whims of leaders like Petro. Those days are over. Under Trump, America sets the terms—and the world is learning fast that there are consequences for defying them.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has thrown Walgreens into the legal spotlight, alleging that the pharmacy giant approved millions of unauthorized prescriptions, contributing to the ongoing opioid crisis. Filed in an Illinois federal court, the lawsuit not only intensifies scrutiny on the role of corporations in the opioid epidemic but also paves the way for potentially massive class action lawsuits and shareholder litigation.

The DOJ complaint paints a grim picture, accusing Walgreens of filling millions of invalid controlled-substance prescriptions from 2012 to the present. These actions allegedly violated federal law and, in some cases, led directly to tragic consequences, including overdose deaths. The lawsuit claims that Walgreens’ corporate management made deliberate choices that allowed these violations to occur.

“The ongoing opioid epidemic has had devastating effects,” the DOJ noted, highlighting the hundreds of thousands of opioid-related deaths in the past decade. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and now president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, emphasized the financial risks for Walgreens. “The Department of Justice filed similar lawsuits against CVS and Walmart during the Biden administration, and Walgreens has already agreed to pay $7 billion to settle previous opioid litigation,” Rahmani said.

This new lawsuit could open the floodgates for victims or their families to pursue legal action, adding significant pressure to Walgreens. If the allegations hold up in court, the potential financial fallout could extend far beyond the DOJ case itself. Shareholders may also file derivative suits, especially as Walgreens’ stock dipped sharply following the announcement.

The pharmacy chain has responded strongly, defending its practices and accusing the government of enforcing arbitrary rules that were never formally codified. A Walgreens spokesperson said the company looks forward to defending “the professionalism and integrity of our pharmacists” and criticized the DOJ for putting pharmacists in what it calls a “no-win situation.”

For investors, this lawsuit raises serious concerns. Walgreens is already reeling from a challenging retail environment, increased competition, and the financial impact of previous settlements related to opioid litigation. A protracted legal battle could drain resources, harm the company’s reputation, and further erode shareholder confidence.

This case also reignites broader questions about corporate accountability in the opioid crisis, which has devastated communities across America. While the DOJ’s legal maneuver is framed as a step toward justice, it also underscores how government agencies are increasingly targeting corporations for their role in the epidemic.

Walgreens’ fate in court will have significant implications for the pharmaceutical and retail pharmacy sectors. If the DOJ prevails, it could set a precedent that holds other companies to stricter standards and exposes them to similar lawsuits. Conversely, if Walgreens successfully defends itself, it could bolster corporate arguments for clearer regulatory guidelines rather than retroactive enforcement.

Ultimately, while Walgreens has vowed to fight back, investors must brace for uncertainty. With billions already paid in settlements and the potential for additional lawsuits looming, this legal battle could weigh heavily on the company’s financial performance and long-term growth. For the industry as a whole, this lawsuit serves as a stark warning: accountability isn’t optional, and the cost of cutting corners can be devastating.

Ford Motor Company’s recent recall of 272,817 vehicles in the United States is a move that raises questions about quality control and could weigh on investor confidence in the short term. The recall, which affects certain 2021-2023 Bronco Sport and 2022-2023 Maverick models, stems from a battery defect that could result in sudden failure. The issue has the potential to cause a loss of critical vehicle functions, including drive power and hazard lights, significantly increasing the risk of accidents.

From a business and investment perspective, this recall underscores challenges in Ford’s operations and quality assurance processes—factors that investors will be closely scrutinizing. With Ford aiming to compete aggressively in both traditional and electric vehicle markets, unforced errors like this could weigh on its reputation and sales.

Recalls aren’t unusual in the automotive sector, and Ford isn’t alone in facing these kinds of issues. However, the timing is less than ideal. Ford is in the middle of its strategic transition toward electrification and advanced vehicle technology, which requires significant capital investment. Quality concerns could deter customers, disrupt revenue projections, and potentially divert resources from Ford’s broader growth strategy.

The direct cost of recalls, including repairs and potential legal liabilities, can also be a concern for investors. While Ford has stated that it will cover the repair costs for affected vehicles, it has not disclosed the estimated financial impact of the recall. Investors should consider how these costs might affect the company’s bottom line in upcoming quarters, especially in a highly competitive environment.

The recall could also reflect poorly on Ford’s supply chain and quality assurance practices. With supply chain disruptions already a key issue in the global auto industry, further inefficiencies or cost overruns could hinder the company’s ability to meet its production and delivery targets.

For investors considering Ford stock, it’s important to weigh this development within the context of Ford’s overall performance. On the one hand, Ford is the only legacy American auto manufacturer to have never filed for bankruptcy. On the other, recurring quality issues—like this battery recall—might signal underlying risks that could cap the company’s upside potential.

Despite this setback, Ford has shown resilience in past challenges. The automaker’s efforts to innovate and expand its EV lineup continue to drive long-term optimism for many analysts. Investors should monitor how Ford manages the fallout from this recall and whether it can maintain customer trust and operational stability.

While the recall might cause short-term pressure on Ford’s stock, the long-term outlook depends on its ability to navigate quality issues. For now, investors should keep an eye on how the recall impacts consumer sentiment, future earnings, and overall operational costs.

The federal government’s financial woes are far deeper than the rosy figures coming out of Washington, according to fiscal watchdogs at the recent “Citizen-Heroes Conference.” Organized by Truth in Accounting, the event exposed the staggering true scope of America’s financial obligations, calling for immediate reforms to prevent the nation’s debt from spiraling out of control.

Sheila Weinberg, Executive Director of Truth in Accounting, didn’t mince words. While the U.S. government officially reports a national debt of $36 trillion, Weinberg revealed the real number is closer to $158 trillion when factoring in unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare. “Our estimate includes more than $50 trillion in unfunded Social Security benefits and over $66 trillion in unfunded Medicare benefits,” she said. That’s nearly $1 million in debt per taxpayer.

And it gets worse. Former CPA Andy Miller warned that Social Security will be insolvent by 2033, while Medicare will run dry by 2039. “The bottom line is the federal government system accounting is just wholly inadequate,” Miller stated.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) itself paints a bleak picture. According to its latest report, public debt is projected to skyrocket to $52 trillion by 2035. But even that dire forecast doesn’t reflect the full extent of the government’s unfunded promises.

David Walker, former Comptroller General of the United States, stressed the urgent need for better financial planning, transparency, and citizen engagement in federal spending decisions. “Failing to act would have severe adverse consequences for America and most Americans over time,” he warned.

The event wasn’t just a lecture on the grim fiscal reality. It was a call to action. Speakers urged influential figures like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to champion full accrual accounting—an honest approach that forces the government to account for its true liabilities. Bold leadership, they argued, is essential to restoring credibility to U.S. fiscal policy.

While Democrats remain busy pushing expensive entitlement programs and green energy fantasies, this conference served as a sobering reminder of what their big-government obsession is costing everyday Americans. The numbers don’t lie, but apparently, the politicians in Washington do.

The federal government’s current accounting practices are nothing short of a sham. Taxpayers are being saddled with a financial time bomb that Washington refuses to defuse. It’s time for leadership that prioritizes fiscal responsibility over political gain. If the government can’t even balance its own checkbook, it has no business lecturing Americans about sacrifice. The debt crisis is a ticking time bomb, and ignoring it isn’t just irresponsible—it’s a betrayal of future generations.

Barron Trump, 18, is proving the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree as he prepares to launch his own luxury real estate venture, Trump, Fulcher & Roxburgh Capital Inc. Teaming up with high school classmates Cameron Roxburgh and Carter Fulcher, Barron is diving headfirst into the world of high-end properties. The venture was initially incorporated in Wyoming last July, with Mar-a-Lago listed as its principal address. While it paused operations after Donald Trump’s election victory, plans are underway for a relaunch in spring 2025, focusing on real estate projects in Utah, Arizona, and Idaho.

While some might dismiss this as another example of “privilege,” anyone paying attention can see this is a young entrepreneur carving his own path with a nod to the family’s legendary business acumen. His father’s influence is evident, but the venture remains independent, with no direct financial backing from the Trump Organization—for now. Roxburgh admitted that Donald Trump has offered his youngest son private advice, proving once again that the Trump family is a tight-knit powerhouse of ambition and know-how.

Carter Fulcher, one of Barron’s partners and the scion of a prominent Idaho real estate firm, brings his expertise to the table. The team hopes to eventually integrate their venture into the Trump empire, a move that would cement Barron’s role in carrying on the family legacy.

While Barron has largely stayed out of the spotlight, his contributions to his father’s 2024 campaign are impossible to ignore. From advising President Trump on outreach to young voters to recommending high-profile podcast appearances on platforms like Joe Rogan and Theo Von, Barron’s strategic insights are paying off in spades. Senior Trump adviser Jason Miller hailed Barron’s influence, calling his suggestions “absolute ratings gold.”

Now a freshman at NYU’s Stern School of Business, Barron is balancing college life with entrepreneurial ambitions. His mother, Melania Trump, has acknowledged the challenges of living in the public eye but remains supportive. “This is your road, this is your life,” she told him, underscoring the individual responsibility and independence that define the Trump ethos.

Predictably, the left will try to dismiss Barron’s achievements, likely chalking them up to nepotism, but let’s be honest—they’d trip over themselves to prop up any liberal elite scion trying the same thing. This venture isn’t just a Trump family win; it’s a testament to the power of conservative values: self-reliance, ambition, and the drive to build something lasting.

Everyday Americans can appreciate the work ethic on display here. While liberals sneer and whine, the Trumps continue to show what real-world success looks like. Barron’s foray into real estate is another reminder that the Trump legacy is alive, well, and focused on building a future rooted in the American dream.

President Donald Trump wasted no time in overturning former President Joe Biden’s Executive Order 14087, a policy that claimed to lower prescription drug costs but instead buried the healthcare system under more bureaucracy. Trump’s swift action on his first day back in the Oval Office signals a return to policies that prioritize market-driven solutions over the left’s heavy-handed government interventions.

Biden’s executive order introduced a patchwork of experimental programs, including capping certain Medicare drug prices at $2 and negotiating pricing for high-cost therapies. It sounded good on paper, but like most Democrat initiatives, it promised much and delivered little. For example, Biden touted this policy as a silver bullet for Americans struggling with high drug costs, but a closer look reveals that it merely created a web of inefficiency, slowing down innovation and driving up costs in the long run.

In Biden’s own words, “Too many Americans face challenges paying for prescription drugs.” Well, no kidding, Joe. After two years of inflationary policies and government overreach, everyday Americans are paying more for everything—including prescription drugs.

In repealing the order, Trump made it clear that Biden’s plans were more about scoring political points than actually helping Americans. “The previous administration embedded deeply unpopular, inflationary, illegal, and radical practices within every agency and office of the federal government,” Trump declared, adding that revoking this order was just the beginning of his efforts to clean house.

Predictably, the Democrats are losing their minds. Alex Floyd, a Democratic National Committee spokesperson, accused Trump of “jacking up the costs of drugs to appease his billionaire backers.” It’s a laughable statement considering it was Biden’s reckless spending that fueled inflation, driving up costs across the board, including healthcare.

By rescinding Biden’s bloated executive order, Trump is paving the way for real solutions. Democrats love to claim they’re sticking it to Big Pharma, but their policies only make it harder for companies to innovate while saddling everyday Americans with higher costs. Trump understands that when you let the free market work, competition drives prices down and improves access for everyone.

For the average American family, this decision is a step toward relief. Biden’s plan might have sounded like a good idea during a campaign speech, but it ignored the bigger picture. Real affordability doesn’t come from government price-fixing—it comes from fostering innovation and competition in a free market. Once again, Trump is showing that his priorities lie with the hardworking Americans who just want to afford their prescriptions without bureaucrats meddling in their wallets.

Washington, D.C., often synonymous with political power, morphed into the nation’s business capital on Monday as President Donald Trump’s inauguration drew an elite cadre of CEOs whose collective net worth surpasses $1.3 trillion. The event showcased Trump’s ability to bridge the divide between business and politics, but not without its share of controversy.

Among the luminaries were Tesla’s Elon Musk, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Apple’s Tim Cook, and Google’s Sundar Pichai. Even TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, fresh off a Supreme Court ruling threatening his app’s U.S. presence, was in attendance. These tech magnates, accompanied by their partners, joined Trump and First Lady Melania Trump for a church service and snagged prime seats at the inauguration—outshining even some of Trump’s incoming cabinet members.

Critics, including outgoing President Joe Biden, took issue with the optics of corporate leaders eclipsing government officials in prominence. The spectacle raised concerns about an emerging “American oligarchy.” However, for Trump’s supporters, it was a testament to the 45th president’s unparalleled business acumen and ability to attract financial heavyweights to his vision.

Musk, a staunch Trump ally, poured $119 million into voter mobilization efforts during the campaign and now heads Trump’s newly minted Department of Government Efficiency (nicknamed “DOGE”). During Trump’s inaugural address, when he vowed to “pursue our manifest destiny into the stars” and plant the American flag on Mars, Musk’s thumbs-up reaction stole the spotlight.

Zuckerberg, once an antagonist of Trump’s presidency, has pivoted significantly. Facebook and Instagram are rolling back alleged anticonservative bias, reinstating Trump’s accounts, and dialing back aggressive fact-checking policies. Meanwhile, corporate America has thrown its weight behind Trump’s agenda, with inauguration fund donations surpassing $200 million. Crypto enthusiasts are especially bullish, with Ripple contributing $5 million in XRP, anticipating friendlier regulatory policies in Trump’s second term.

The pageantry of Trump’s inauguration sets the stage for an aggressive agenda. Expected executive orders include declaring illegal immigration a national emergency, paving the way for military involvement in mass deportations. With Wall Street and Silicon Valley lining up behind him, Trump’s second term is shaping up to be one where business and governance collide—and critics and supporters alike are watching closely.

Excerpt: President Donald Trump’s inauguration drew the nation’s most powerful business leaders, signaling a second term driven by corporate alignment, bold policy moves, and an ambitious vision for America’s future.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!